Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Wednesday, 3 February, 2010
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Morrus" data-source="post: 5076870" data-attributes="member: 1"><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><strong>[imager]http://www.enworld.org/newsimages/lwdlogo.png[/imager]Lone Wolf demands people stop using the term "Army Builder" in conversation</strong></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">Lone Wolf Development has </span><a href="http://www.tabletopgamingnews.com/2010/02/01/33231" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: 12px">sent a letter</span></a><span style="font-size: 12px"> to Privateer Press and others demanding that they prevent their forum users from using the term "Army Builder" in conversation, and that any such posts be edited or removed:</span></p><p style="margin-left: 20px"><span style="font-size: 12px">There are two things that need to be done. First of all, improper references to the Army Builder trademark on the forums must be addressed. This can be achieved in either of two ways, or potentially a combination of both, at your discretion. The first option would be to remove such posts. Since this could appear harsh and potentially disrupt forum discussions, an acceptable alternative would be to revise such posts to utilize a generic term (e.g. “roster construction tool”, “list createor”, or “points calculator”) in place of the “Army Builder” name.</span></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"><span style="font-size: 12px">The second thing that needs to be addressed is that your forum users must be educated about the term Army Builder being a trademark and only applicable to our brand of products. This is necessary to avoid an ongoing problem and mitigate the future need for removal of improper posts. I’m sure you would also prefer that the forums continue to run smoothly and without interruption, so your assistance in getting forum users to utilize appropriate terms will benefit us all.</span></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">Privateer Press has responded by removing ALL references to "Army Builder" and using the forum filter to change any reference to Lone Wolf's product to "iBodger", their own army-building application: </span></p><p style="margin-left: 20px"><span style="font-size: 12px">In order to comply with this request we are compelled to take immediate and drastic action. As a result of this letter we are more than happy to remove the presence of “Army Builder” from the forums as requested. As we cannot control how this registered mark might be used in every sentence and in every post we will be required to remove it from appearing on this forum. From this moment onward the phrase “Army Builder” can never appear again on this forum, in any form, so as to ensure that no perceived harm or implied dilution come to the Lone Wolf Development property of the same name. Furthermore, because past forum posts could still be referenced, in an effort to be complete we must delete entire offending threads. We know how much time and effort went in to creating all of the assets this dedicated community has made available on these forums, and we sympathize with you about the ensuing loss. We apologize for the burden and inconvenience this forced moderation places on you. </span></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"><span style="font-size: 12px">In the future, any attempts to reference “Army Builder” will be benignly changed to “iBodger”, our officially recognized and supported iPhone application for Force Creation. I thank you for your understanding in this matter. </span></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"><span style="font-size: 12px">Brent Waldher </span></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"><span style="font-size: 12px">Licensing and Contract Manager </span></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"><span style="font-size: 12px">Privateer Press, Inc. </span></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">Lone Wolf has made a couple of statements about the issue. The </span><a href="http://forums.wolflair.com/showthread.php?t=9731" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: 12px">first reads</span></a><span style="font-size: 12px">:</span></p><p style="margin-left: 20px"><span style="font-size: 12px">"...we are legally required to police our trademarks. We don't make the laws, but we do have to abide by them. Whether you agree with those laws is immaterial."</span></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">The </span><a href="http://forums.wolflair.com/showthread.php?t=9735" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: 12px">second statement</span></a><span style="font-size: 12px"> is longer and more detailed, and explains that the issue is twofold - (1) that fans are creating "army builders" and using the trademarked term to name them; and (2) that fans are "incorrectly" using the term "army builder" in conversation to generically refer to a "roster creation tool" and asserts that:</span></p><p style="margin-left: 20px"><span style="font-size: 12px">"So what happens with internet forum sites? Does a trademark owner need to individually contact every person on a given site and convince them to use a trademark properly?* And what if an individual refuses to cooperate? How does this impact free speech? With regards to free speech, anyone is personally allowed to observe or ignore trademarks in what they say to others. However, what is said on an internet forum is ultimately under the control of the site owner. As such, when there is a problem with users on a forum site, the correct action is to contact the site owner and enlist their assistance. Site owners are obliged to assist, especially where infringement is taking place, or could be deemed as complicit and face possible liability."</span> </p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-size: 9px">*The answer to this question is "yes". It is the trademark owner's responsibility to educate the general public about use of the trademark, not anyone else's. "It's too much work, let's pass the buck" is not an acceptable answer.</span> - ed.</span></p><p> </p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">He goes on to say:</span></p><p style="margin-left: 20px"><span style="font-size: 12px">The problem stems from an issue called "trademark genericization". If a trademark is allowed by its owner to become a household word that is used to generically refer to the domain of the trademark, then the trademark can be declared to have become "generic".</span></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">This is true to an extent. But an attempt to characterize "Army Builder" as in danger of becoming a "household word" seems somewhat.... optimistic. Sure, Xerox, Hoover and (to a lesser extent) Adobe may have had a point; and it happened with "zipper", "escalator", "aspirin" and "thermos" - but Lone Wolf Development? </span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">Lone Wolf (at the above link) denies sending cease-and-desist letters to Privateer Press:</span></p><p style="margin-left: 20px"><span style="font-size: 12px">Some people have characterized it as a formal Cease & Desist letter, but it was actually a post to the admins written by me and not by our attorney. </span></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><a href="http://www.forwardkommander.com/trademark.pdf" target="_blank">Here is the PDF</a> of their letter to the <a href="http://www.forwardkommander.com/" target="_blank">Forward Kommander</a> website, from Robert A. Lippman, associate at Lemery Greisler LLC, Attorneys-at-Law, which reads:</span></p><p style="margin-left: 20px"><span style="font-size: 12px">"We are counsel to Lone Wolf Development, owner of the ARMY BUILDER(r) trademark..... Our client's mark has been in continuous use since 1998, is well known... [etc.]"</span></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">This C&D is, of course, not the same letter which Privateer Press received, and refers to an actual product using the trademarked name. The letter to Privateer Press appears merely to be an email from someone at Lone Wolf.</span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">Is Lone Wolf right or wrong? Discuss this issue </span><a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/general-rpg-discussion/271482-lone-wolf-sends-cease-desist-letters-anyone-using-term-army-builder.html" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: 12px">right here</span></a><span style="font-size: 12px">.</span></p><p> </p><p style="text-align: center">[d]gf[/d]</p><p></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><strong><a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/blogs/l5r-design-diaries/2286-designer-diary-3-correcting-mistakes-past.html" target="_blank">[imager]http://www.enworld.org/newsimages/Crime_and_Punishment.jpg[/imager]</a>Legend of the Five Rings 4th Edition Designer Diaries</strong></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">The third of the official design diaries for Alderac Entertainment Group's 4th edition of <em>Legend of the Five Rings </em>has been posted here on EN World. The diaries highlight the development process, preview art, and more! This installment is titled "<a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/blogs/l5r-design-diaries/2286-designer-diary-3-correcting-mistakes-past.html" target="_blank"><span style="color: #800080">Correcting the Mistakes of the Past</span></a>".</span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">Here's the schedule for the full series:</span> </p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><span style="font-size: 12px">January 8: </span><a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/blogs/l5r-design-diaries/2217-designer-diary-1-anatomy-new-edition.html" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="color: #ffff99">The Anatomy of a New Edition</span></span></a></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><span style="font-size: 12px">January 20: </span><a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/blogs/l5r-design-diaries/2248-designer-diary-2-philosophy-4th-edition.html" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: 12px">The Philosophy of 4th Edition</span></a></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><span style="font-size: 12px">February 3: <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/blogs/l5r-design-diaries/2286-designer-diary-3-correcting-mistakes-past.html" target="_blank">Correcting the Mistakes of the Past</a></span></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><span style="font-size: 12px">February 17: Timeline Neutrality and Finding the Clan Themes</span></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><span style="font-size: 12px">March 3: The "Feel" of Rokugan</span></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><span style="font-size: 12px">March 17: Designing Skills</span></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><span style="font-size: 12px">March 31: Designing Advantages & Disadvantages</span></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><span style="font-size: 12px">April 14: Designing Schools - Bushi</span></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><span style="font-size: 12px">April 28: Designing Schools - Courtier</span></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><span style="font-size: 12px">May 12: Designing Schools - Shugenja</span></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><span style="font-size: 12px">May 26: Designing Secondary Systems</span></li> </ul></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Morrus, post: 5076870, member: 1"] [SIZE=3][B][imager]http://www.enworld.org/newsimages/lwdlogo.png[/imager]Lone Wolf demands people stop using the term "Army Builder" in conversation[/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=3]Lone Wolf Development has [/SIZE][URL="http://www.tabletopgamingnews.com/2010/02/01/33231"][SIZE=3]sent a letter[/SIZE][/URL][SIZE=3] to Privateer Press and others demanding that they prevent their forum users from using the term "Army Builder" in conversation, and that any such posts be edited or removed:[/SIZE] [INDENT][SIZE=3]There are two things that need to be done. First of all, improper references to the Army Builder trademark on the forums must be addressed. This can be achieved in either of two ways, or potentially a combination of both, at your discretion. The first option would be to remove such posts. Since this could appear harsh and potentially disrupt forum discussions, an acceptable alternative would be to revise such posts to utilize a generic term (e.g. “roster construction tool”, “list createor”, or “points calculator”) in place of the “Army Builder” name.[/SIZE] [SIZE=3]The second thing that needs to be addressed is that your forum users must be educated about the term Army Builder being a trademark and only applicable to our brand of products. This is necessary to avoid an ongoing problem and mitigate the future need for removal of improper posts. I’m sure you would also prefer that the forums continue to run smoothly and without interruption, so your assistance in getting forum users to utilize appropriate terms will benefit us all.[/SIZE] [/INDENT][SIZE=3]Privateer Press has responded by removing ALL references to "Army Builder" and using the forum filter to change any reference to Lone Wolf's product to "iBodger", their own army-building application: [/SIZE] [INDENT][SIZE=3]In order to comply with this request we are compelled to take immediate and drastic action. As a result of this letter we are more than happy to remove the presence of “Army Builder” from the forums as requested. As we cannot control how this registered mark might be used in every sentence and in every post we will be required to remove it from appearing on this forum. From this moment onward the phrase “Army Builder” can never appear again on this forum, in any form, so as to ensure that no perceived harm or implied dilution come to the Lone Wolf Development property of the same name. Furthermore, because past forum posts could still be referenced, in an effort to be complete we must delete entire offending threads. We know how much time and effort went in to creating all of the assets this dedicated community has made available on these forums, and we sympathize with you about the ensuing loss. We apologize for the burden and inconvenience this forced moderation places on you. [/SIZE] [SIZE=3]In the future, any attempts to reference “Army Builder” will be benignly changed to “iBodger”, our officially recognized and supported iPhone application for Force Creation. I thank you for your understanding in this matter. [/SIZE] [SIZE=3]Brent Waldher [/SIZE] [SIZE=3]Licensing and Contract Manager [/SIZE] [SIZE=3]Privateer Press, Inc. [/SIZE] [/INDENT][SIZE=3]Lone Wolf has made a couple of statements about the issue. The [/SIZE][URL="http://forums.wolflair.com/showthread.php?t=9731"][SIZE=3]first reads[/SIZE][/URL][SIZE=3]:[/SIZE] [INDENT][SIZE=3]"...we are legally required to police our trademarks. We don't make the laws, but we do have to abide by them. Whether you agree with those laws is immaterial."[/SIZE] [/INDENT][SIZE=3]The [/SIZE][URL="http://forums.wolflair.com/showthread.php?t=9735"][SIZE=3]second statement[/SIZE][/URL][SIZE=3] is longer and more detailed, and explains that the issue is twofold - (1) that fans are creating "army builders" and using the trademarked term to name them; and (2) that fans are "incorrectly" using the term "army builder" in conversation to generically refer to a "roster creation tool" and asserts that:[/SIZE] [INDENT][SIZE=3]"So what happens with internet forum sites? Does a trademark owner need to individually contact every person on a given site and convince them to use a trademark properly?* And what if an individual refuses to cooperate? How does this impact free speech? With regards to free speech, anyone is personally allowed to observe or ignore trademarks in what they say to others. However, what is said on an internet forum is ultimately under the control of the site owner. As such, when there is a problem with users on a forum site, the correct action is to contact the site owner and enlist their assistance. Site owners are obliged to assist, especially where infringement is taking place, or could be deemed as complicit and face possible liability."[/SIZE] [/INDENT][SIZE=3][SIZE=1]*The answer to this question is "yes". It is the trademark owner's responsibility to educate the general public about use of the trademark, not anyone else's. "It's too much work, let's pass the buck" is not an acceptable answer.[/SIZE] - ed.[/SIZE] [SIZE=3]He goes on to say:[/SIZE] [INDENT][SIZE=3]The problem stems from an issue called "trademark genericization". If a trademark is allowed by its owner to become a household word that is used to generically refer to the domain of the trademark, then the trademark can be declared to have become "generic".[/SIZE] [/INDENT][SIZE=3]This is true to an extent. But an attempt to characterize "Army Builder" as in danger of becoming a "household word" seems somewhat.... optimistic. Sure, Xerox, Hoover and (to a lesser extent) Adobe may have had a point; and it happened with "zipper", "escalator", "aspirin" and "thermos" - but Lone Wolf Development? [/SIZE] [SIZE=3]Lone Wolf (at the above link) denies sending cease-and-desist letters to Privateer Press:[/SIZE] [INDENT][SIZE=3]Some people have characterized it as a formal Cease & Desist letter, but it was actually a post to the admins written by me and not by our attorney. [/SIZE] [/INDENT][SIZE=3][URL="http://www.forwardkommander.com/trademark.pdf"]Here is the PDF[/URL] of their letter to the [URL="http://www.forwardkommander.com/"]Forward Kommander[/URL] website, from Robert A. Lippman, associate at Lemery Greisler LLC, Attorneys-at-Law, which reads:[/SIZE] [INDENT][SIZE=3]"We are counsel to Lone Wolf Development, owner of the ARMY BUILDER(r) trademark..... Our client's mark has been in continuous use since 1998, is well known... [etc.]"[/SIZE] [/INDENT][SIZE=3]This C&D is, of course, not the same letter which Privateer Press received, and refers to an actual product using the trademarked name. The letter to Privateer Press appears merely to be an email from someone at Lone Wolf.[/SIZE] [SIZE=3]Is Lone Wolf right or wrong? Discuss this issue [/SIZE][URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/general-rpg-discussion/271482-lone-wolf-sends-cease-desist-letters-anyone-using-term-army-builder.html"][SIZE=3]right here[/SIZE][/URL][SIZE=3].[/SIZE] [CENTER][d]gf[/d][/CENTER] [SIZE=3][B][URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/blogs/l5r-design-diaries/2286-designer-diary-3-correcting-mistakes-past.html"][imager]http://www.enworld.org/newsimages/Crime_and_Punishment.jpg[/imager][/URL]Legend of the Five Rings 4th Edition Designer Diaries[/B][/SIZE] [SIZE=3]The third of the official design diaries for Alderac Entertainment Group's 4th edition of [I]Legend of the Five Rings [/I]has been posted here on EN World. The diaries highlight the development process, preview art, and more! This installment is titled "[URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/blogs/l5r-design-diaries/2286-designer-diary-3-correcting-mistakes-past.html"][COLOR=#800080]Correcting the Mistakes of the Past[/COLOR][/URL]".[/SIZE] [SIZE=3]Here's the schedule for the full series:[/SIZE] [LIST] [*][SIZE=3]January 8: [/SIZE][URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/blogs/l5r-design-diaries/2217-designer-diary-1-anatomy-new-edition.html"][SIZE=3][COLOR=#ffff99]The Anatomy of a New Edition[/COLOR][/SIZE][/URL] [*][SIZE=3]January 20: [/SIZE][URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/blogs/l5r-design-diaries/2248-designer-diary-2-philosophy-4th-edition.html"][SIZE=3]The Philosophy of 4th Edition[/SIZE][/URL] [*][SIZE=3]February 3: [URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/blogs/l5r-design-diaries/2286-designer-diary-3-correcting-mistakes-past.html"]Correcting the Mistakes of the Past[/URL][/SIZE] [*][SIZE=3]February 17: Timeline Neutrality and Finding the Clan Themes[/SIZE] [*][SIZE=3]March 3: The "Feel" of Rokugan[/SIZE] [*][SIZE=3]March 17: Designing Skills[/SIZE] [*][SIZE=3]March 31: Designing Advantages & Disadvantages[/SIZE] [*][SIZE=3]April 14: Designing Schools - Bushi[/SIZE] [*][SIZE=3]April 28: Designing Schools - Courtier[/SIZE] [*][SIZE=3]May 12: Designing Schools - Shugenja[/SIZE] [*][SIZE=3]May 26: Designing Secondary Systems[/SIZE] [/LIST] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Wednesday, 3 February, 2010
Top