Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="chatdemon" data-source="post: 241287" data-attributes="member: 228">That is true, admittedly, but IMO it is one of 3E's biggest mistakes. They obviously went the easy, boring route "magic + death = necromancy", rather than do something creative and make a death goddess who isn't tied to necromancers for once. I was very disappointed..Again, this is something 3E did, in prior greyhawk products, she is listed as LN (LE) indicating strong evil tendencies, derived from her vanity aspect.Even using strict 3e interpretations of Wee Jas, this comment seems flawed, after all, her clerics can choose to inflict wounds using their spontaneous casting, rather than curing wounds. It all comes down to your interpretation of the material, but the rules seem to suggest a noticeable nuetral or even evil pattern to her behavior.This depends on your campaign world. IMO, a traditional psuedo-european fantasy world would not condone this, especially in a mythical world where the afterlife is percieved by the people to be real. Those who play with dead things would be shunned and hated and seen as sick bastards, if not lynched outright.</blockquote>