Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="delericho" data-source="post: 5695733" data-attributes="member: 22424">Ah, I see. You realise that that was almost nothing at all to do with giving the people what they wanted, and a lot more about tying in to the upcoming video game? Likewise, &quot;The Book of Vile Darkness&quot; is a tie in to the film. (And I thought there was a third tie in coming up, but I cannot for the life of me think what it is.)That's true, but of course decisions that have to do with the content are much more a matter of opinion.Personally, I would argue that their decision to publish so many books so quickly was a mistake - they've introduced massive option bloat to 4e and mined out their product line far too fast.I would also argue that Fortune Cards were a massive mistake. But that's probably just my utterly irrational hate of the things talking.But, yeah, when it comes to the content of D&amp;D, I would tend to agree that they haven't made any truly bad mistakes recently.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="delericho, post: 5695733, member: 22424"] Ah, I see. You realise that that was almost nothing at all to do with giving the people what they wanted, and a lot more about tying in to the upcoming video game? Likewise, "The Book of Vile Darkness" is a tie in to the film. (And I thought there was a third tie in coming up, but I cannot for the life of me think what it is.) That's true, but of course decisions that have to do with the content are much more a matter of opinion. Personally, I would argue that their decision to publish so many books so quickly was a mistake - they've introduced massive option bloat to 4e and mined out their product line far too fast. I would also argue that Fortune Cards were a massive mistake. But that's probably just my utterly irrational hate of the things talking. But, yeah, when it comes to the content of D&D, I would tend to agree that they haven't made any truly bad mistakes recently. [/QUOTE]

Verification