Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="cuteasaurus" data-source="post: 2328319" data-attributes="member: 31597">Different kind of weird... <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />In the late 1890s the 'Bosom Ring', came into fashion briefly, andsold in expensive Parisian jewellery shops. These 'Anneux De Sein'were inserted through the nipple, and some women wore on either sidelinked with a delicate chain. The rings enlarged the nipples and keptthem in a state of constant excitation...the medical community wasoutraged by these cosmetic procedures, for they represented arejection of traditional conceptions of the purpose of a woman'sbody.&quot; &quot;Anatomy &amp; Destiny&quot; Stephen Kern&nbsp;&quot;For a long time I could not understand why I should consent to such apainful operation without sufficient reason. I soon, however came tothe conclusion that many ladies are ready to bear the passing pain forthe sake of love. I found that the breasts of those who wore ringswere incomparably rounder and fuller developed than those who did not.My doubts were now at an end...so I had my nipples pierced, and whenthe wounds were healed, I had rings inserted...with regard to theexperience of wearing these rings, I can only say that they are not inthe least uncomfortable or painful. On the contrary, the slightrubbing and slipping of the rings causes in me an extremelytitillating feeling, and all my colleagues I have spoken to on thissubject have confirmed my opinion.&quot; London socialite writing in&quot;Vogue&quot; 1890<a href="http://www.painfulpleasures.com/piercing_history.htm" target="_blank">http://www.painfulpleasures.com/piercing_history.htm</a>&nbsp;Hmm...Ms. Christie is British...&nbsp;&nbsp;Edit: I'd like to point out that this is the time-period of the actual &quot;Prince Albert&quot; <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/nervous.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":heh:" title="Nervous Laugh&nbsp; &nbsp; :heh:" data-shortname=":heh:" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="cuteasaurus, post: 2328319, member: 31597"] Different kind of weird... ;) In the late 1890s the 'Bosom Ring', came into fashion briefly, and sold in expensive Parisian jewellery shops. These 'Anneux De Sein' were inserted through the nipple, and some women wore on either side linked with a delicate chain. The rings enlarged the nipples and kept them in a state of constant excitation...the medical community was outraged by these cosmetic procedures, for they represented a rejection of traditional conceptions of the purpose of a woman's body." "Anatomy & Destiny" Stephen Kern "For a long time I could not understand why I should consent to such a painful operation without sufficient reason. I soon, however came to the conclusion that many ladies are ready to bear the passing pain for the sake of love. I found that the breasts of those who wore rings were incomparably rounder and fuller developed than those who did not. My doubts were now at an end...so I had my nipples pierced, and when the wounds were healed, I had rings inserted...with regard to the experience of wearing these rings, I can only say that they are not in the least uncomfortable or painful. On the contrary, the slight rubbing and slipping of the rings causes in me an extremely titillating feeling, and all my colleagues I have spoken to on this subject have confirmed my opinion." London socialite writing in "Vogue" 1890 [url="http://www.painfulpleasures.com/piercing_history.htm"]http://www.painfulpleasures.com/piercing_history.htm[/url] Hmm...Ms. Christie is British... Edit: I'd like to point out that this is the time-period of the actual "Prince Albert" :heh: [/QUOTE]

Verification