Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
Meta - Forums About Forums
Meta
Welcome to the 5th anniversary!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="barsoomcore" data-source="post: 1932140" data-attributes="member: 812"><p>Hey, MM, I'm sorry you feel underappreciated. If you're not enjoying it, don't do it.</p><p></p><p>I believe you that it's a huge amount of effort to make these new styles. Which leads back to my original question: why do it if the current style is working okay? I mean, if there isn't a compelling reason to make the change, why bother, given that it's so much effort?</p><p></p><p>Nothing looks more mechanical than repeating patterns -- the textures currently part of this theme look MORE mechanical than the flat colours we had before, not less. Take a look at the great dialog sites on the net -- SlashDot, A List Apart, Wikipedia. Look at the Creative Commons site. Heck, look at Google, probably the most useful site on the entire internet. They don't look mechanical, they look SIMPLE. USEFUL. COMFORTABLE. They don't sprawl with repetitive textures</p><p></p><p>I spend a lot of time on ENWorld -- and I PAY to do so. When you go ahead and make a bunch of changes without consulting me, and make the site significantly less useful to me, I'm sorry, but I'm not going to tell you I'm happy about it. If that makes you angry, well, again I'm sorry. But like buzz and Turanil have said, I consider it important that I contribute my opinions to the discussion on how this site should look. You're free to ignore them, of course.</p><p></p><p>Nobody knows better than I how much work you're putting into this, Mike. I'm not trying to call you names. I'm trying to tell you that this appearance makes the site less useful to me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="barsoomcore, post: 1932140, member: 812"] Hey, MM, I'm sorry you feel underappreciated. If you're not enjoying it, don't do it. I believe you that it's a huge amount of effort to make these new styles. Which leads back to my original question: why do it if the current style is working okay? I mean, if there isn't a compelling reason to make the change, why bother, given that it's so much effort? Nothing looks more mechanical than repeating patterns -- the textures currently part of this theme look MORE mechanical than the flat colours we had before, not less. Take a look at the great dialog sites on the net -- SlashDot, A List Apart, Wikipedia. Look at the Creative Commons site. Heck, look at Google, probably the most useful site on the entire internet. They don't look mechanical, they look SIMPLE. USEFUL. COMFORTABLE. They don't sprawl with repetitive textures I spend a lot of time on ENWorld -- and I PAY to do so. When you go ahead and make a bunch of changes without consulting me, and make the site significantly less useful to me, I'm sorry, but I'm not going to tell you I'm happy about it. If that makes you angry, well, again I'm sorry. But like buzz and Turanil have said, I consider it important that I contribute my opinions to the discussion on how this site should look. You're free to ignore them, of course. Nobody knows better than I how much work you're putting into this, Mike. I'm not trying to call you names. I'm trying to tell you that this appearance makes the site less useful to me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Meta - Forums About Forums
Meta
Welcome to the 5th anniversary!
Top