pawsplay said:Ironically, printing said index would violate the GSL. No page numbers.
mattdm said:And in further irony, if you don't agree to the GSL, making an index with page numbers is quite likely completely legitimate fair use.
Ruin Explorer said:There's something so profoundly wrong and darkly amusing about that juxtaposed with professionals not even being able to say what page a rule or monster is on.
Mourn said:Agreed. I can understand them not wanting you to reprint monster stat blocks (because someone would end up reprinting the entire Monster Manual that way), but I can't see how allowing direct page number citations is bad.
TimeOut said:Because if there is a second, third, whatever print run of the MM and the Orcs are moved one page back due to errata, someone could say "Well this D&D compatible product says page 201, but they are on page 202. Lousy quality control! Won't buy again! *nerdrage*"