Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ulrick" data-source="post: 75429" data-attributes="member: 775">Call me ignorant but what is the &quot;SCA&quot;?&nbsp; I swear I've heard it before.I really don't mind Drizzt, but I would like to see rangers altered and strengthed a bit, and ability prequisites brought back so not every body can be a ranger.I did, however, create a few years back a figther using the Player's Option books from 2e.&nbsp; The DM said, &quot;Go ahead, use any rule from any of the books.&quot;&quot;Okay,&quot; I said.&nbsp; I rolled up my stats.&nbsp; I got an 18/00 strength!--I have witnesses!Then in choosing weapon proficiencies I stacked up ambidexerity, and two-weapon fighting skills---My character could wield a bastard sword in both hands without any penalties.That character was a power trip.&nbsp; He got to the point where he could attack 5 times every 2 two rounds.I even converted him to 3e, though he now gets penalties, he's still a brute.&nbsp; An 18/00 = 22 str in 3e.His name is Ulrick.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ulrick, post: 75429, member: 775"] Call me ignorant but what is the "SCA"? I swear I've heard it before. I really don't mind Drizzt, but I would like to see rangers altered and strengthed a bit, and ability prequisites brought back so not every body can be a ranger. I did, however, create a few years back a figther using the Player's Option books from 2e. The DM said, "Go ahead, use any rule from any of the books." "Okay," I said. I rolled up my stats. I got an 18/00 strength!--I have witnesses! Then in choosing weapon proficiencies I stacked up ambidexerity, and two-weapon fighting skills--- My character could wield a [I]bastard sword[/I] in both hands without any penalties. That character was a power trip. He got to the point where he could attack 5 times every 2 two rounds. I even converted him to 3e, though he now gets penalties, he's still a brute. An 18/00 = 22 str in 3e. His name is Ulrick. [/QUOTE]

Verification