Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="jgerman" data-source="post: 4932132" data-attributes="member: 61755">And I asked what examples, which you failed to provide. Even when provided with specific examples to the contrary.You're entitled to your opinion, I'm entitled to try and figure out where that opinion comes from or if it's completely unsupported. Are you really reading, or are you skimming to try and make the point that you've already got in your head is correct?Each righteous success results in an additional die of that type rolled. Successes and failures on those dice must then be folded into the pool... and more importantly further righteous successes result in ANOTHER die. This ends when no more righteous successes are rolled and each time you need to fold in the results. Now if you want to nit-pick my use of the word re-roll instead of saying roll an additional die to make yourself feel better that's fine. It doesn't change the multi-step process required to achieve a result in 3e.No matter which way you slice it you do NOT just roll ONE time, except in the degenerate case where you roll no righteous successes and EVEN in that case you have to go through steps to build the pool and resolve it.Edit: And I just checked my original post, there's nothing inaccurate with the way I described it.</blockquote>