Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Scrivener of Doom" data-source="post: 6266168" data-attributes="member: 87576">I must admit, I bought this when it first came because EGG's name wasn't on the cover. The incomplete, randomly-generated, turgid dreck of the Temple of Elemental Evil - coupled with the inane &quot;one true way&quot; Dragon editorials of a few years earlier - had turned me off anything with Gary's name on by that point. I was pleased to see the names of different authors on the cover instead.And I was pleased with their effort. Sure, it's an old school megadungeon but they had really made an effort to make it interesting in parts and they crammed a lot of material into the adventure's pages.Frankly, I still think they did a better job than the 3.5E version Expedition to the Ruins of Castle Greyhawk as well. (I know, I know: burn me at the stake for heresy.)Good job on the review. If I ever run AD&amp;D or S&amp;W again I think I will try it with this.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Scrivener of Doom, post: 6266168, member: 87576"] I must admit, I bought this when it first came [I]because[/I] EGG's name [B]wasn't[/B] on the cover. The incomplete, randomly-generated, turgid dreck of the [I]Temple of Elemental Evil[/I] - coupled with the inane "one true way" Dragon editorials of a few years earlier - had turned me off anything with Gary's name on by that point. I was pleased to see the names of different authors on the cover instead. And I was pleased with their effort. Sure, it's an old school megadungeon but they had really made an effort to make it interesting in parts and they crammed [B][I]a lot[/I][/B] of material into the adventure's pages. Frankly, I still think they did a better job than the 3.5E version [I]Expedition to the Ruins of Castle Greyhawk[/I] as well. (I know, I know: burn me at the stake for heresy.) Good job on the review. If I ever run AD&D or S&W again I think I will try it with this. [/QUOTE]

Verification