NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Argyle King" data-source="post: 7976907" data-attributes="member: 58416">I think that because intersectionality is rarely a one-dimensional thing.Certainly, there are broad areas which can -generally- be commonly applied. For example, there are common cultural themes concerning the lack of African American literature in many academic programs, and that is something with which a broad spectrum of people may be able to identify.However, it may also be arguable (and in fact is a point of contention in many communities) that a member of [insert minority group here] is not a real member of [minority] group because [insert reasons that make that individual more similar to the dominant culture]. In the case of Kanye west, his level of wealth and his political views can, in some circles, lead to him being said to not be "black enough" or some similar criticism. (Note: I am saying neither that I support nor that I oppose this; it is simply to offer context.) Similarly, black women are currently one of the fastest growing groups of Americans gaining college educations. At times, this leads to criticisms of not sounding black enough while speaking (while also not fully being accepted in some circles of traditional academia).So, I "think that" because -while I agree with having diversified points of view- I question by what metric an "authentic" point of view be measured?Additionally, if an "authentic" -based upon skin tone- yet inaccurate viewpoint were written, is that seen as objectively more valuable or more morally correct than an accurate viewpoint offered by someone with the "wrong" outward appearance? This is an especially good contemporary question because identity is currently perceived as more fluid than it has been in the past, so by what metric is the authenticity of an author's identity measured through their work?Certainly, I feel that there is value in seeing a topic through the lens of someone who has experienced in a way that I cannot due to the realities of how the culture around me sees me and interacts with me. I am not questioning the validity of seeking out other viewpoints, nor am I questioning the value of doing so. I am questioning how the metric of authenticity (and the associated authority to be allowed to write something) is measured.</blockquote>

Verification