Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What’s So Great About Medieval Europe?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="fearsomepirate" data-source="post: 7980119" data-attributes="member: 7021420"><p>I had kind of a shower thought on orcs.</p><p></p><p>If you want to run a serious setting where the orcs are more "ugly humans" than "malevolent spawn of the god of destruction," you should probably look more at nomadic raiding societies than violent 20th-century ideologies like Nazism.</p><p></p><p>What does the tribal raider see when he looks at civilization? We tend to assume that he, like city-dweller, sees himself as "primitive" and civilization as "advanced," and longs to live in a stone building in a city, be part of the development of new technologies, and only doesn't because the city-dwellers are keeping him out.</p><p></p><p>But what we often see is that the raider's view of the world isn't "primitive" vs "advanced," but "strong" vs "weak." He sees agrarian civilization in terms of those sleepy villages of weak men, who waste all their time growing tired in the fields, who never learn how to wield spear or bow, who are fit for little more than to die by the sword when the snows melt and the time is ripe for plunder.</p><p></p><p>The history of civilization is hardly one of continual expanse. There are plenty of examples of those raiding nomads getting the upper hand over cities and showing very little interest in preserving or adopting their ways. To us in the 20th century, we've got that 20/20 hindsight that civilization ultimately won, but to a Comanche warrior in 1760, or a Mongolian horse archer in 1240, his territory has been continually expanding, he's slaughtered his enemies, and if the world of cities and farms has anything he can use to become a more deadly raider, he's had little difficulty obtaining it. Why would he ever adopt their ways? They are weak, and he is strong.</p><p></p><p>Note that in our world, civilization's decisive victory over nomadic raiders was in the 19th century, over 400 years after the invention of firearms. In the D&D world, when it comes to war-making, orcs and elves aren't nearly at the disparity that, say, Americans and Comanche were at in 1870. What we have, then, are two radically incompatible and opposed ways of life, in a world where the people at civilization's boundaries are easy picking for the raiders beyond them. To the elf, the orc is a violent, uncultured savage, whose way of life is mindless, destructive brutality. To the orc, the world consists of hunters and prey, and these foolish elves have adopted a way of life that makes them weak...if the elf wants to be prey, then the orc is happy to oblige.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="fearsomepirate, post: 7980119, member: 7021420"] I had kind of a shower thought on orcs. If you want to run a serious setting where the orcs are more "ugly humans" than "malevolent spawn of the god of destruction," you should probably look more at nomadic raiding societies than violent 20th-century ideologies like Nazism. What does the tribal raider see when he looks at civilization? We tend to assume that he, like city-dweller, sees himself as "primitive" and civilization as "advanced," and longs to live in a stone building in a city, be part of the development of new technologies, and only doesn't because the city-dwellers are keeping him out. But what we often see is that the raider's view of the world isn't "primitive" vs "advanced," but "strong" vs "weak." He sees agrarian civilization in terms of those sleepy villages of weak men, who waste all their time growing tired in the fields, who never learn how to wield spear or bow, who are fit for little more than to die by the sword when the snows melt and the time is ripe for plunder. The history of civilization is hardly one of continual expanse. There are plenty of examples of those raiding nomads getting the upper hand over cities and showing very little interest in preserving or adopting their ways. To us in the 20th century, we've got that 20/20 hindsight that civilization ultimately won, but to a Comanche warrior in 1760, or a Mongolian horse archer in 1240, his territory has been continually expanding, he's slaughtered his enemies, and if the world of cities and farms has anything he can use to become a more deadly raider, he's had little difficulty obtaining it. Why would he ever adopt their ways? They are weak, and he is strong. Note that in our world, civilization's decisive victory over nomadic raiders was in the 19th century, over 400 years after the invention of firearms. In the D&D world, when it comes to war-making, orcs and elves aren't nearly at the disparity that, say, Americans and Comanche were at in 1870. What we have, then, are two radically incompatible and opposed ways of life, in a world where the people at civilization's boundaries are easy picking for the raiders beyond them. To the elf, the orc is a violent, uncultured savage, whose way of life is mindless, destructive brutality. To the orc, the world consists of hunters and prey, and these foolish elves have adopted a way of life that makes them weak...if the elf wants to be prey, then the orc is happy to oblige. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What’s So Great About Medieval Europe?
Top