Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Yaarel" data-source="post: 8570463" data-attributes="member: 58172">Heh, I am relieved that you recognize that 3e psionics is spellcasting with a paintjob.3e psionics has many fans who like psionics as spellcasting. (A 5e spell point system that doesnt hurt the eyes is a worthy goal.)With that in mind, using the 5e Psion for 3e spellcasting and using the 5e Mystic for 2e nonspell features, is an easy solution.I agree, a 5e psionic conjurer needs to be built from scratch.At the least, we need a cantrip called &quot;Metacreativity&quot;, that conjures objects out of force. The conjuration starts with minor effects appropriate to a cantrip and can use higher slots for more powerful effects.5e lacks a Conjurer/Shaper/Summoner class, and a psionic version of this class might be worth a third 5e psionic class, or have it be a subclass for either Psion or Mystic.Right. A psionic construct is made out of ones own telekinetic force.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Yaarel, post: 8570463, member: 58172"] Heh, I am relieved that you recognize that 3e psionics is spellcasting with a paintjob. 3e psionics has many fans who like psionics as spellcasting. (A 5e spell point system that doesnt hurt the eyes is a worthy goal.) With that in mind, using the 5e Psion for 3e spellcasting and using the 5e Mystic for 2e nonspell features, is an easy solution. I agree, a 5e psionic conjurer needs to be built from scratch. At the least, we need a cantrip called "Metacreativity", that conjures objects out of force. The conjuration starts with minor effects appropriate to a cantrip and can use higher slots for more powerful effects. 5e lacks a Conjurer/Shaper/Summoner class, and a psionic version of this class might be worth a third 5e psionic class, or have it be a subclass for either Psion or Mystic. Right. A psionic construct is made out of ones own telekinetic force. [/QUOTE]

Verification