Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Runestar" data-source="post: 5111857" data-attributes="member: 72317">Quite a number of feats don't seem to fit into any clear role.For instance, shock trooper improves your damage dramatically, at the expense of AC. Is this supposed to be a brute or artillery concept? Some of the feats are also fairly general-purpose - they would fit equally well in any role, IMO. I feel improved initiative is one such feat. He who goes last may end up not getting to go at all. Though I feel that if everyone takes said feat, then it is as good as no one taking it at all, and so would refrain from having every single monster take it. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue    :p"  data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" />Also, there is the question of whether you want the feat to help showcase a monster's particular role, or shore up weaknesses inherent in that role. In this aspect, iron will can either be a good brute choice or a poor one.Examples?</blockquote>