Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="AbdulAlhazred" data-source="post: 6022964" data-attributes="member: 82106">Yeah, notice that the game NEVER allows you to get another class' at-will as an at-will, at least until you PMC or can get Versatile Master (which is pretty much broken powerful). Hybrids also let you stack at-wills from different classes with class features of other classes, but at least the designers have a chance there to cut things back and even then MCing to Ranger for Twin Strike or Warlock for Eyebite is pretty obvious. At-wills, being infinitely usable, tend to combine in obnoxious ways with other class' features. It isn't really a good idea to allow MCing unlimited access to them. Encounter access is already pretty nice anyway. In the context of 5e though the question comes back to why would the cost of 4e MCing matter? 5e can establish some different cost/benefit equation, so it is the CONCEPT that should be assessed, not the cost in 4e or other specific details. 5e is a different enough system that the concept would certainly end up quite different in detail anyway (honestly it is questionable if it is even a viable concept given the sad refusal to have a common power structure).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="AbdulAlhazred, post: 6022964, member: 82106"] Yeah, notice that the game NEVER allows you to get another class' at-will as an at-will, at least until you PMC or can get Versatile Master (which is pretty much broken powerful). Hybrids also let you stack at-wills from different classes with class features of other classes, but at least the designers have a chance there to cut things back and even then MCing to Ranger for Twin Strike or Warlock for Eyebite is pretty obvious. At-wills, being infinitely usable, tend to combine in obnoxious ways with other class' features. It isn't really a good idea to allow MCing unlimited access to them. Encounter access is already pretty nice anyway. In the context of 5e though the question comes back to why would the cost of 4e MCing matter? 5e can establish some different cost/benefit equation, so it is the CONCEPT that should be assessed, not the cost in 4e or other specific details. 5e is a different enough system that the concept would certainly end up quite different in detail anyway (honestly it is questionable if it is even a viable concept given the sad refusal to have a common power structure). [/QUOTE]

Verification