Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What a great storytelling DM looks like
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ariosto" data-source="post: 5084929" data-attributes="member: 80487"><p>I have <em>discounted</em> some actual play -- specifically, RPGA play -- in considering aspects in which it is notably eccentric relative to the game as presented in the texts.</p><p></p><p>The fact of taking the rulebook (!) into account is not the same as taking no account of actual play, unless it were the case that the two were utterly unrelated (in which case, it is obscure on what basis one might expect any given example of actual play to resemble any other, or indeed to what end one might offer a 'new edition' in the first place). I do not think you have considered carefully the implications of your suggestion!</p><p></p><p>I accept that those who have claimed to loathe with a passion this or that 'edition' are being honest.</p><p></p><p>Does sarcasm really obscure the point? Then I guess I must spell out that you have held up as an increase in wealth what is in fact at best a zero-sum game of "I've got mine, Jack, get yours." If you seriously believed I would believe that no new game could be published under a new name, then you must have supposed me so ignorant of your company's history.</p><p></p><p>Even if one is determined not in fact to <em>increase</em> the range of offerings, it is still possible to present under a different name something that is in fact different. Firms do that with <em>the same thing</em>, even!</p><p></p><p>If the game that once was called D&D was such a horrible imposition on people who did not like it, then how is 4e not just as horrible? How is not <em>any</em> game just as bad? I mean, RuneQuest uses d%, and does not have character classes or levels or experience points; it is in way after way quite different from 4e! Tunnels & Trolls has classes and levels and experience points, but is in other ways as mutually incomprehensible with old D&D as is 4e. If you want 'builds" without petty limits, and really super-duper heroes, and far-out tactical combat with miniatures on a grid, then Champions has got you covered -- but it also is not 4e.</p><p></p><p>And, surprise, surprise ... well, not really, for those of us who not only are acquainted with the industry's history but have lived through it ... <em>not one of those other games is called Dungeons & Dragons</em>.</p><p></p><p>Against that, the evidence you offer that any new game from WotC must be called D&D is -- what? The evidence that WotC cannot offer more than one game is what? You just throw out these unsupported claims as if they were Newton's Laws.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ariosto, post: 5084929, member: 80487"] I have [i]discounted[/i] some actual play -- specifically, RPGA play -- in considering aspects in which it is notably eccentric relative to the game as presented in the texts. The fact of taking the rulebook (!) into account is not the same as taking no account of actual play, unless it were the case that the two were utterly unrelated (in which case, it is obscure on what basis one might expect any given example of actual play to resemble any other, or indeed to what end one might offer a 'new edition' in the first place). I do not think you have considered carefully the implications of your suggestion! I accept that those who have claimed to loathe with a passion this or that 'edition' are being honest. Does sarcasm really obscure the point? Then I guess I must spell out that you have held up as an increase in wealth what is in fact at best a zero-sum game of "I've got mine, Jack, get yours." If you seriously believed I would believe that no new game could be published under a new name, then you must have supposed me so ignorant of your company's history. Even if one is determined not in fact to [i]increase[/i] the range of offerings, it is still possible to present under a different name something that is in fact different. Firms do that with [i]the same thing[/i], even! If the game that once was called D&D was such a horrible imposition on people who did not like it, then how is 4e not just as horrible? How is not [i]any[/i] game just as bad? I mean, RuneQuest uses d%, and does not have character classes or levels or experience points; it is in way after way quite different from 4e! Tunnels & Trolls has classes and levels and experience points, but is in other ways as mutually incomprehensible with old D&D as is 4e. If you want 'builds" without petty limits, and really super-duper heroes, and far-out tactical combat with miniatures on a grid, then Champions has got you covered -- but it also is not 4e. And, surprise, surprise ... well, not really, for those of us who not only are acquainted with the industry's history but have lived through it ... [i]not one of those other games is called Dungeons & Dragons[/i]. Against that, the evidence you offer that any new game from WotC must be called D&D is -- what? The evidence that WotC cannot offer more than one game is what? You just throw out these unsupported claims as if they were Newton's Laws. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What a great storytelling DM looks like
Top