Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What Actually Is Copyright Protected In The SRD?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="teitan" data-source="post: 8883679" data-attributes="member: 3457"><p>Wizards already defined what was IP and what wasn’t and trademarked what was in 2000 and the years since. They’ve pulled a Kleenex in my opinion. </p><p></p><p>Kleenex used to be a trademark and it no longer is because the Kleenex corporation failed to defend the trademark for so long that when another company launched calling their brand of tissue paper Kleenexes and they tried to sue the Kleenex corporation lost and could not enforce their rights to the name or use it in their logo etc. </p><p></p><p>Wizards failed to enforce their claim to their IP, in fact, they gave it away in the SRD with the OGL and Re-enforced it with the lack of a System Trademark License for 5e and by just using the OGL and adding some 5e terms to the SRD. It’s arguable in court that when they released the material included in the SRD and did not identify it as IP that they allowed it into fair use as it is therein defined. Only allowing for the specific names, characters, campaign settings for example, to remain IP and the limited monsters that define D&D like Beholders and Mind Flayers also remaining in their control by virtue of not being in the SRD. Their recorded stance for 22 years has been that they couldn’t revoke the OGL and it was structured and written to be forever so that the game will always exist. </p><p></p><p>Pathfinder is an example of just this exact thing and it does not in any way violate Wizard’s IP. Castles & Crusades is another example, it can be argued that Wizards yanked their Seige engine (not OGC) for their save & proficiency system, possibly violating their IP. The list goes on and on of the OGL enabling this aspect of the stated intent by Wizards and their development team and their legal statements in that regard for 22 years. </p><p></p><p>Now they’re claiming that people are making a profit of their IP. No, no, no, no. There is no IP in the SRD or allowed in usage by OGL. If someone is making a profit of their IP through 3pp then it’s a violation of the OGL and Wizards is at fault as well because… Wizards is ignorant of their own Open license, as evidenced by the leaked 1.1. </p><p></p><p>The term OGL has been profanely used to vulgarly, and I don’t mean in the perverse or religious sense, gosh, to refer to a string of licenses that WOtC offered and long time members of these boards know what I mean. The OGL is just a one page text defining how Open Gaming under that particular license works and how to define it vs IP and publish with the license. It has come to mean 3pp for D&D during the 5e era. </p><p></p><p>Where Wizards has shot themselves on this in my opinion is that they didn’t take the care that they did with 3.x. In 3.x they had the OGL and the System Trademark License. If you wanted to publish content advertised as compatible or for use with D&D you had to use both licenses. The OGL to indicate use of the SRD and what was OGC and what was you IP in the product and the STL to indicate compatibility and use with D&D and the STL was more restrictive in its use. Closer to the 1.1 leak and it protected Wizards from liability and harm from less than reputable 3pp while not demanding royalties, registration and essentially things that harm the rest of the industry. For some reason, when returning to using the OGL for 3pp they did not create a compatibility license and logo so any Tom, Dick and Harry could create content for 5e and less knowledgeable or caring folk were definitely using Wizards IP as well since they could just pull out a Monster Manual and ASSUME it was fair game. Wizards wasn’t careful with 5e and 3pp so the last 10 years the cat has been shredding the license and it’s their own fault and their legal team hasn’t a clue what their going on about because they’ve obviously mixed all these things up and assumed OGL=D&D and not Fate, Star Wars (good luck Hasbro, you’re going to have a hard time fighting that one), Dragon Age (first game was built off KOTOR engine, OGL and SRD derived), Year Zero Engine and all the other games that have been released under the license that Wizards assured everyone for 22 years would not end and that their IP was protected. Oops.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="teitan, post: 8883679, member: 3457"] Wizards already defined what was IP and what wasn’t and trademarked what was in 2000 and the years since. They’ve pulled a Kleenex in my opinion. Kleenex used to be a trademark and it no longer is because the Kleenex corporation failed to defend the trademark for so long that when another company launched calling their brand of tissue paper Kleenexes and they tried to sue the Kleenex corporation lost and could not enforce their rights to the name or use it in their logo etc. Wizards failed to enforce their claim to their IP, in fact, they gave it away in the SRD with the OGL and Re-enforced it with the lack of a System Trademark License for 5e and by just using the OGL and adding some 5e terms to the SRD. It’s arguable in court that when they released the material included in the SRD and did not identify it as IP that they allowed it into fair use as it is therein defined. Only allowing for the specific names, characters, campaign settings for example, to remain IP and the limited monsters that define D&D like Beholders and Mind Flayers also remaining in their control by virtue of not being in the SRD. Their recorded stance for 22 years has been that they couldn’t revoke the OGL and it was structured and written to be forever so that the game will always exist. Pathfinder is an example of just this exact thing and it does not in any way violate Wizard’s IP. Castles & Crusades is another example, it can be argued that Wizards yanked their Seige engine (not OGC) for their save & proficiency system, possibly violating their IP. The list goes on and on of the OGL enabling this aspect of the stated intent by Wizards and their development team and their legal statements in that regard for 22 years. Now they’re claiming that people are making a profit of their IP. No, no, no, no. There is no IP in the SRD or allowed in usage by OGL. If someone is making a profit of their IP through 3pp then it’s a violation of the OGL and Wizards is at fault as well because… Wizards is ignorant of their own Open license, as evidenced by the leaked 1.1. The term OGL has been profanely used to vulgarly, and I don’t mean in the perverse or religious sense, gosh, to refer to a string of licenses that WOtC offered and long time members of these boards know what I mean. The OGL is just a one page text defining how Open Gaming under that particular license works and how to define it vs IP and publish with the license. It has come to mean 3pp for D&D during the 5e era. Where Wizards has shot themselves on this in my opinion is that they didn’t take the care that they did with 3.x. In 3.x they had the OGL and the System Trademark License. If you wanted to publish content advertised as compatible or for use with D&D you had to use both licenses. The OGL to indicate use of the SRD and what was OGC and what was you IP in the product and the STL to indicate compatibility and use with D&D and the STL was more restrictive in its use. Closer to the 1.1 leak and it protected Wizards from liability and harm from less than reputable 3pp while not demanding royalties, registration and essentially things that harm the rest of the industry. For some reason, when returning to using the OGL for 3pp they did not create a compatibility license and logo so any Tom, Dick and Harry could create content for 5e and less knowledgeable or caring folk were definitely using Wizards IP as well since they could just pull out a Monster Manual and ASSUME it was fair game. Wizards wasn’t careful with 5e and 3pp so the last 10 years the cat has been shredding the license and it’s their own fault and their legal team hasn’t a clue what their going on about because they’ve obviously mixed all these things up and assumed OGL=D&D and not Fate, Star Wars (good luck Hasbro, you’re going to have a hard time fighting that one), Dragon Age (first game was built off KOTOR engine, OGL and SRD derived), Year Zero Engine and all the other games that have been released under the license that Wizards assured everyone for 22 years would not end and that their IP was protected. Oops. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What Actually Is Copyright Protected In The SRD?
Top