Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What alignment is House?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kahuna Burger" data-source="post: 3535469" data-attributes="member: 8439"><p>Hrm, the "nice /= good and good /= nice" discussion.... In my expereince, a lot of folks enjoy the archetype of the Good (or even exalted) Jerk. Niceness is usually conflated with politelness and meanness with being plain spoken, and niceness is claimed as a fake facade. "I'm too busy saving your life to worry about your feelings!"</p><p></p><p>I'd like to suggest a different aproach. A long term pattern of Good behavior is inspired, at its core, by compassion. Its about not wanting people to suffer. Good people don't want to hurt other people, and don't want to see other people hurt. </p><p></p><p>Evil on the other hand is about a lack of compassion. Evil people either don't care about the suffering of others, enjoy the suffering of others, or consider their suffering in some way unreal and irrelevant.</p><p></p><p>How does this relate to niceness? Emotional suffering exists. In the grand sceme of things it isn't as important (usually) as physical suffering or world wide evil plots, but it is real and a Good person should, in the overall, want to avoid or alieviate it. So while there are many reasons a Evil person could pretend to be nice, a Good person should, imo, generally be nice unless there is a compelling reason not to be. They should not seek out excuses to be mean "for a person's own good", they should not be hurtful when a kind approach would be just as effective, and they should not be proud of their hurtfullness under the guise of "plain speaking". </p><p></p><p>So my veiw is, Good does not always = nice and nice does not always = Good.... <strong>But</strong> they go together more often than they don't and meanness is always a taint on good action. Niceness - that is, making an effort to aliviate emotional suffering or reduce it - is usually a good action. Meanness - causing or increasing emotional suffering - is usually an evil action. Just like in any other case, good people can take evil actions when neccassary and evil people can do good things for their own purposes, but that doesn't make mean and nice irrelevant to good and evil - it just makes them not exactly the same.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kahuna Burger, post: 3535469, member: 8439"] Hrm, the "nice /= good and good /= nice" discussion.... In my expereince, a lot of folks enjoy the archetype of the Good (or even exalted) Jerk. Niceness is usually conflated with politelness and meanness with being plain spoken, and niceness is claimed as a fake facade. "I'm too busy saving your life to worry about your feelings!" I'd like to suggest a different aproach. A long term pattern of Good behavior is inspired, at its core, by compassion. Its about not wanting people to suffer. Good people don't want to hurt other people, and don't want to see other people hurt. Evil on the other hand is about a lack of compassion. Evil people either don't care about the suffering of others, enjoy the suffering of others, or consider their suffering in some way unreal and irrelevant. How does this relate to niceness? Emotional suffering exists. In the grand sceme of things it isn't as important (usually) as physical suffering or world wide evil plots, but it is real and a Good person should, in the overall, want to avoid or alieviate it. So while there are many reasons a Evil person could pretend to be nice, a Good person should, imo, generally be nice unless there is a compelling reason not to be. They should not seek out excuses to be mean "for a person's own good", they should not be hurtful when a kind approach would be just as effective, and they should not be proud of their hurtfullness under the guise of "plain speaking". So my veiw is, Good does not always = nice and nice does not always = Good.... [b]But[/b] they go together more often than they don't and meanness is always a taint on good action. Niceness - that is, making an effort to aliviate emotional suffering or reduce it - is usually a good action. Meanness - causing or increasing emotional suffering - is usually an evil action. Just like in any other case, good people can take evil actions when neccassary and evil people can do good things for their own purposes, but that doesn't make mean and nice irrelevant to good and evil - it just makes them not exactly the same. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What alignment is House?
Top