Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Yair" data-source="post: 2444059" data-attributes="member: 10913">Perhaps the most alluring thing in IH, for me, is just this point. IH seems to be designed to balance per encounter rather than per day, and even then you don't get x/encounter but rather spend actions to get tokens to do the actions you want... so it's dynamic. No more problems of powerful psions in a one-encounter-per-day campaign. No more senseless restricitons like smite 1/day, or casting magic missile 3/day. This really is its most appealing point for me.The second point is having a non-magic-item advancement that's balanced and playable. That's another key attraction.The overly detailed battle can be good or bad, I'm not sure. Seems to offer great flavor and diversity, but at the cost of immense complexity and DM prep-time. Of course, IH claims it doesn't cost anything. Depending on how that pans out, I may adopt IH or not. We'll see.  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>