Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Nightfall" data-source="post: 1832802" data-attributes="member: 374">Alright firstly as Mike said, it was a typo. PC SHOULD have been listed as doing Sorcerers as Mike did Bards, and Ethan Skemp did Wizards.  Secondly, Yes the Wizards "revision" of class books tend to be better. (not that much better but some good ideas.) I can't say I agree with everything that's come out with from others but I know reading Quint Sorcerer, some people were more impressed with that (Psion in particular) than they were with PG: Wizards, Bards and Sorcerers.  Yes they aren't ground breaking in their movements but to me, (and until I see Complete Adventurer), I've yet to see a REALLY good Ranger's book since PG: Rangers and Rogues. Nor have I seen much in other books about paladins or monks besides PG: Paladins and Monks. (This is especially true considering the SL monk is less "eastern" minded and more "mystically" oriented, especially using the Dragon type as one idea.)  I will also agree with Trick that, yes Divine and the Defeated gives a lot more than say Deities and Demi-gods or some other books on the Divine (Complete Divine included. I still think the combined might of PG: Clerics and Druids plus that book completely outweighs most any other divinity type book but that's my opinion) Anyway I hope to see you all tonight at 7 pm EST at the chat. I intend to be there.</blockquote>