Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What Are The Changes In Pathfinder Remastered?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jimmy Dick" data-source="post: 9007559" data-attributes="member: 6994416"><p>I am happy to see alignment disappear. Most of the younger crowd has been ignoring alignment for a long time. I was actually surprised to still see it in Pathfinder 1e when I first encountered that game system years ago. Based on many of the comments about alignment, it seems that the younger crowd doesn't care about it at all (not just my players) and it seems like it's an older crowd of grognards who want to keep it around. I meet the definition of grognard easily based on age and playing experience (I started in 79 with a D&D box set), but I favor making good changes to game systems. I was thrilled when Paizo developed the Champion class and created different versions of holy warriors. By getting rid of alignment, they can now dive into this area much deeper than before due to the limits of the alignment system.</p><p></p><p>Some classes need adjustments like the Alchemist. Classes like Wizard and Sorcerer could benefit with items that increase their Spell Attack Roll to put them on a par with martial classes and their magic weapons. I primarily play casters (Wizards!) and the Attack rolls are a huge part of the game. As 2e's three action economy emphasizes landing critical hits with the first attack of the character's turn, casters were hurting in that regard.</p><p></p><p>Simply reorganizing the information which is spread out over multiple books into 2 player books and 1 GM book was something Paizo's crew had looked at doing around the 5-year mark of Second Edition. Making these changes was pushed up due to the OGL crisis. Keeping the game fresh via something like this is a very good idea. Waiting too long to do it could easily end up in creating an entirely new edition which is what I really think is going to happen with D&D next year. WotC can say all they want about it not being a new edition, but it really looks more and more like a totally new edition. Eventually, all editions reach a point where they need to be replaced. But maybe it is possible to sustain an edition longer than what we have seen over time.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jimmy Dick, post: 9007559, member: 6994416"] I am happy to see alignment disappear. Most of the younger crowd has been ignoring alignment for a long time. I was actually surprised to still see it in Pathfinder 1e when I first encountered that game system years ago. Based on many of the comments about alignment, it seems that the younger crowd doesn't care about it at all (not just my players) and it seems like it's an older crowd of grognards who want to keep it around. I meet the definition of grognard easily based on age and playing experience (I started in 79 with a D&D box set), but I favor making good changes to game systems. I was thrilled when Paizo developed the Champion class and created different versions of holy warriors. By getting rid of alignment, they can now dive into this area much deeper than before due to the limits of the alignment system. Some classes need adjustments like the Alchemist. Classes like Wizard and Sorcerer could benefit with items that increase their Spell Attack Roll to put them on a par with martial classes and their magic weapons. I primarily play casters (Wizards!) and the Attack rolls are a huge part of the game. As 2e's three action economy emphasizes landing critical hits with the first attack of the character's turn, casters were hurting in that regard. Simply reorganizing the information which is spread out over multiple books into 2 player books and 1 GM book was something Paizo's crew had looked at doing around the 5-year mark of Second Edition. Making these changes was pushed up due to the OGL crisis. Keeping the game fresh via something like this is a very good idea. Waiting too long to do it could easily end up in creating an entirely new edition which is what I really think is going to happen with D&D next year. WotC can say all they want about it not being a new edition, but it really looks more and more like a totally new edition. Eventually, all editions reach a point where they need to be replaced. But maybe it is possible to sustain an edition longer than what we have seen over time. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What Are The Changes In Pathfinder Remastered?
Top