Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What are the "dead settings" of D&D?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wingsandsword" data-source="post: 7988269" data-attributes="member: 14159"><p>A big problem with measuring anything like this is assuming that online polls, surveys forums etc. really are accurate at measuring gamers.</p><p></p><p>That assumes people are participating in WotC's surveys (if they aren't into the current edition, having been "fired" by WotC as a customer during the transition to 4e and walked away from official D&D forums and social media, or otherwise having stopped paying attention to new releases) that's right out. They aren't on forums like this. </p><p></p><p>There are a lot of people who play D&D who aren't on forums, they aren't interacting with WotC on social media, they play their games with their friends. . .who often aren't online (or if they are, interacting with WotC or ENWorld or virtual tabletops or whatever aren't what they are doing).</p><p></p><p>You really can't measure that. That caveat belongs on any numbers about what editions or settings are played. . .that there can be significant enclaves of off-the-grid gamers holding on to older editions and settings.</p><p></p><p>WotC measuring things for market research, for customers who will buy things, is one thing because they're measuring their current active customers. . .but fans of older settings and editions are basically "underground" from that perspective.</p><p></p><p>When you're trying to measure who's playing old settings, the problem is assuming that fans of new rules are using settings from 20 or 30 years ago.</p><p></p><p>I remember making some friends circa 2004. . .that had been playing AD&D 1st edition since the early 80's, they'd played for over 20 years with the same group of friends and family (and new family members as they were born and grew up). They generally stopped paying attention to new releases when 2e came out, I think they said the 1e Greyhawk hardcover was their last book they'd bought. They eventually modernized to 3.5 circa 2005, but still play 3.5 with Greyhawk even to this day, they don't touch online gaming culture, and don't need to buy new stuff constantly.</p><p></p><p>I know a few people who are absolutely fanatical about Planescape, and consider that their favorite setting and the main one they run when they play D&D. . .none of them are really interacting with online D&D culture, they may have Facebook or Twitter, but that doesn't mean that WotC is anything on their radar, or that they're playing 5e (maybe a third to half my gaming friends still stick to 3.5, I'm fuzzy on the number because some prefer 3.5 but play 5e if it's all that's available).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wingsandsword, post: 7988269, member: 14159"] A big problem with measuring anything like this is assuming that online polls, surveys forums etc. really are accurate at measuring gamers. That assumes people are participating in WotC's surveys (if they aren't into the current edition, having been "fired" by WotC as a customer during the transition to 4e and walked away from official D&D forums and social media, or otherwise having stopped paying attention to new releases) that's right out. They aren't on forums like this. There are a lot of people who play D&D who aren't on forums, they aren't interacting with WotC on social media, they play their games with their friends. . .who often aren't online (or if they are, interacting with WotC or ENWorld or virtual tabletops or whatever aren't what they are doing). You really can't measure that. That caveat belongs on any numbers about what editions or settings are played. . .that there can be significant enclaves of off-the-grid gamers holding on to older editions and settings. WotC measuring things for market research, for customers who will buy things, is one thing because they're measuring their current active customers. . .but fans of older settings and editions are basically "underground" from that perspective. When you're trying to measure who's playing old settings, the problem is assuming that fans of new rules are using settings from 20 or 30 years ago. I remember making some friends circa 2004. . .that had been playing AD&D 1st edition since the early 80's, they'd played for over 20 years with the same group of friends and family (and new family members as they were born and grew up). They generally stopped paying attention to new releases when 2e came out, I think they said the 1e Greyhawk hardcover was their last book they'd bought. They eventually modernized to 3.5 circa 2005, but still play 3.5 with Greyhawk even to this day, they don't touch online gaming culture, and don't need to buy new stuff constantly. I know a few people who are absolutely fanatical about Planescape, and consider that their favorite setting and the main one they run when they play D&D. . .none of them are really interacting with online D&D culture, they may have Facebook or Twitter, but that doesn't mean that WotC is anything on their radar, or that they're playing 5e (maybe a third to half my gaming friends still stick to 3.5, I'm fuzzy on the number because some prefer 3.5 but play 5e if it's all that's available). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What are the "dead settings" of D&D?
Top