Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Nergal Pendragon" data-source="post: 6509093" data-attributes="member: 6777649">No light at all on the roles; I think we've reached an understanding on them <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />Beyond that? I don't think you can classify superheroes based entirely on build; it's based on how they act that they better fit the roles. So, maybe less focus on how big they are and more on what they do?Which, I think, was kinda what 4E was trying to do.And I think I'm going to accept that I can't explain it that well and bow out of this. I am uncertain how to proceed from here, and reviews of my comments made up to this point reveal that they could be taken as a slam on the playing style of another or as hostile in tone. As such, I cannot claim I am in the right on this topic.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Nergal Pendragon, post: 6509093, member: 6777649"] No light at all on the roles; I think we've reached an understanding on them ;) Beyond that? I don't think you can classify superheroes based entirely on build; it's based on how they act that they better fit the roles. So, maybe less focus on how big they are and more on what they do? Which, I think, was kinda what 4E was trying to do. And I think I'm going to accept that I can't explain it that well and bow out of this. I am uncertain how to proceed from here, and reviews of my comments made up to this point reveal that they could be taken as a slam on the playing style of another or as hostile in tone. As such, I cannot claim I am in the right on this topic. [/QUOTE]

Verification