Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="steeldragons" data-source="post: 6509146" data-attributes="member: 92511">If only. We can only hope.Unfortunately, that is not the case as, if you had read beyond those first two things [and I have no reason to believe you didn't], everything else...every other type of character in my post, other than what you quoted, is describing ever descending circles and levels of granularity and specialty.Albeit with some attempts at injecting some humor into the raging stampede of ridiculous this thread has become at this point, with all of the &quot;Us's&quot; and &quot;Thems&quot; well established. Nobody will be changing anyone's mind/view/opinions/preferences and/or perspectives. So it really is as useful as banging one's head against a brick wall for anyone reading it and expecting any sort of &quot;reasoned/rational answer&quot; to the questions posed.Thus, if you had acknowledged what I'd actually posted, you would not have been able to make these little proclamations about &quot;At this level of abstraction...&quot;. Because everything from there [after fighter or magic-user], from &quot;Cleric&quot; onward, is less and less abstracted.So, ya know, good for you. You can take quotes out of context, use them to support your points, and comment on what you want supported. Well done.Just wanted to point this out to those who might not have noticed or read the actual post involved. But it, most certainly, was not cut where it was &quot;for brevity&quot;.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="steeldragons, post: 6509146, member: 92511"] If only. We can only hope. Unfortunately, that is not the case as, if you had read beyond those first two things [and I have no reason to believe you didn't], everything else..[I].every[/I] other type of character in my post, other than what you quoted, is describing ever descending circles and levels of granularity and specialty. Albeit with some attempts at injecting some humor into the raging stampede of ridiculous this thread has become at this point, with all of the "Us's" and "Thems" well established. Nobody will be changing anyone's mind/view/opinions/preferences and/or perspectives. So it really is as useful as banging one's head against a brick wall for anyone reading it and expecting any sort of "reasoned/rational answer" to the questions posed. Thus, if you had acknowledged what I'd [I]actually[/I] posted, you would not have been able to make these little proclamations about "At this level of abstraction...". Because everything from there [after fighter or magic-user], from "Cleric" onward, is less and less abstracted. So, ya know, good for you. You can take quotes out of context, use them to support your points, and comment on what you want supported. Well done. Just wanted to point this out to those who might not have noticed or read the actual post involved. But it, most certainly, was not cut where it was "for brevity". [/QUOTE]

Verification