Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Sadras" data-source="post: 6509624" data-attributes="member: 6688277">Problem is people do not generally look at 4e and immediately think Essentials in the same vein that people do not immediately think Skills and Powers when discussing 2e. And lets be frank, how many Essential players are in this discussion and how many are 4e AEDU users? I cannot remember but was Essentials well supported by even the 4e community? That is not to say I do not agree with most of your post @<a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/member.php?u=22779" target="_blank">Hussar</a>, I actually do agree, but to claim that the non-4e players in this thread are unaware of what Essentials and later 4e books brought to the table is assuming a lot. Online posters are generally better informed of other games/rules/ideas given their active participation in the community.I doubt there is anyone here who is dismissing 4e's contribution to 5e.</blockquote>