Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Aribar" data-source="post: 6516775" data-attributes="member: 6777974">I can't even tell what people are arguing about in this topic any more. As someone who likes 4E and Basic and hates 3.5, I don't even see edition warring... Just people saying "yeah, I don't like the way roles work in your system but I'm totally cool with you liking it" for at least the last 15 pages between odd things regarding hit points of the age old wizards > fighter stuff.You can definitely say there are different roles to the game. You can definitely divide them up in a bunch of different ways. In combat there's ranged/melee damage, buffer, debuffer, healer, battlefield control... In my opinion it's fuzzy in 3.5 and 5 since they weren't made to be well-designed -games-, but there's definitely mechanical differences between classes and they fit different roles with different amounts of ease.</blockquote>