Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What are the Roles now?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BryonD" data-source="post: 6520820" data-attributes="member: 957"><p>I'm sorry, but you are not really addressing anything I'm saying here.</p><p></p><p></p><p>First, again, I don't accept you putting terms on my experience.</p><p></p><p>That aside, if you say you experience immersion in poker while playing checkers, or you say you hate checkers but feel immersion in checkers while not doing it, so be it. I think these positions are quite odd, but that make no difference to me or the actual point I'm making. There is an aspect of what makes RPGs fun to me ( and a lot of other people) that you are clearly failing to grasp and you keep substituting other things into the conversation that defeat making any progress.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So you take issue when you claim that I have falsely described your experience. Then you describe MY experience and when I say "no, that is not right" you tell me that this is an un-compelling argument.</p><p></p><p>OK.</p><p></p><p>Like I've said several times now. You can't get anywhere with closed minded presumptions.</p><p></p><p>This is a thread in the 5E board. It has certainly derailed several times over. But there is a constant theme and that is (roughly and in simple terms) "how things in 5E (and other editions) are perceived and enjoyed by people who dislike the 4E analogs of those things". There is a long stream of replies from the pro-4E side that repeatedly insert the 4E versions as not analogs, but as the exact same thing in all manners of perception and experience. And if that were true it would be non-sense for anyone to take exception to them in 4E and yet enjoy them in other editions. And the 4E fans seem to take this point and run with it, proclaiming other opinions to be nonsense by this reasoning. And yet the very fact that it happens is proof (at least to any reasonable view of popular opinion and market acceptance) that the logic fails because the founding presumption of equivalence is in error. If you want to talk about 4E things purely from a 4E perspective then it seems to me that you should go to a 4E forum. You are welcome to bring your 4E perspective to the 5E forums, but you need to accept that differences in perspective will be quite important to advancing the conversation.</p><p></p><p>Lastly: though I still reject your use of the term "flow", I strongly reject your statement regarding what I "cannot find". The point of the conversation is about what provides the greatest fun and maximum satisfaction from the gaming experience.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BryonD, post: 6520820, member: 957"] I'm sorry, but you are not really addressing anything I'm saying here. First, again, I don't accept you putting terms on my experience. That aside, if you say you experience immersion in poker while playing checkers, or you say you hate checkers but feel immersion in checkers while not doing it, so be it. I think these positions are quite odd, but that make no difference to me or the actual point I'm making. There is an aspect of what makes RPGs fun to me ( and a lot of other people) that you are clearly failing to grasp and you keep substituting other things into the conversation that defeat making any progress. So you take issue when you claim that I have falsely described your experience. Then you describe MY experience and when I say "no, that is not right" you tell me that this is an un-compelling argument. OK. Like I've said several times now. You can't get anywhere with closed minded presumptions. This is a thread in the 5E board. It has certainly derailed several times over. But there is a constant theme and that is (roughly and in simple terms) "how things in 5E (and other editions) are perceived and enjoyed by people who dislike the 4E analogs of those things". There is a long stream of replies from the pro-4E side that repeatedly insert the 4E versions as not analogs, but as the exact same thing in all manners of perception and experience. And if that were true it would be non-sense for anyone to take exception to them in 4E and yet enjoy them in other editions. And the 4E fans seem to take this point and run with it, proclaiming other opinions to be nonsense by this reasoning. And yet the very fact that it happens is proof (at least to any reasonable view of popular opinion and market acceptance) that the logic fails because the founding presumption of equivalence is in error. If you want to talk about 4E things purely from a 4E perspective then it seems to me that you should go to a 4E forum. You are welcome to bring your 4E perspective to the 5E forums, but you need to accept that differences in perspective will be quite important to advancing the conversation. Lastly: though I still reject your use of the term "flow", I strongly reject your statement regarding what I "cannot find". The point of the conversation is about what provides the greatest fun and maximum satisfaction from the gaming experience. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What are the Roles now?
Top