Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What are the Roles now?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 6534746" data-attributes="member: 6790260"><p>I think your example is...more than a little far-fetched. Even if we make all of the characters involved "normal" characters (that is, ones which follow the rules of character creation even if it means not doing everything Gandalf etc. could do), the level-1 Hobbits are going to have net bonuses to their <em>best</em> stuff (max stat+proficiency) of roughly +6, while Gandalf and Aragorn rock roughly +11. If he's an Evoker (reasonable, he makes fireworks) Gandalf can do more damage with a low-rolling <em>cantrip</em> than those Hobbits can do on a <em>crit.</em> And that has nothing on the Hobbits being at risk of immediate death if fighting anything above level 6 or so.</p><p></p><p>In certain narrowly specific ways, yes, this party "works" more than it would have. Most, but not all, foes can be hit by the hobbits with non-crit attacks, but many of them will still be in the 10-15% range. Most, but not all, enemies will not be <em>guaranteed</em> to hit the hobbits, but their odds of success will be in the 70%-or-higher range. Skill checks that Aragorn finds challenging (say, 40% odds of success) will be nearly impossible for the hobbits (roughly 10-20% <em>with</em> proficiency and a +3 stat; impossible, or nearly so, if lacking both). So...yeah, I don't think your example is especially great.</p><p></p><p>I can accept, however, that characters within ~5 levels of each other, as long as none of them are below level 3, are close to equivalent in strength; the HD make the biggest difference, and the higher level you are, the smaller that relative difference becomes. The first three levels have such tiny HP values and such enormous risk of death (a typical orc can drop many 1st-level characters with a single crit; two hard hits can outright kill a fragile class) that it is...unwise, IMO, to mix "higher than level 4" characters with characters at level 1 or 2.</p><p></p><p>TL;DR: No, I really <em>don't</em> think Level 20 Gandalf (or even level 14 Aragorn) can adventure confidently alongside level 1 Samwise and level 2 Frodo. But I do think level 6 Subotai, level 7 Conan, and level 4 Valeria can adventure together more or less alright. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yeah, again, this depends on the difficulty of the check. With a total bonus of -1, if you're trying to do something Hard (DC 20) you cannot possibly succeed. I wouldn't be at all surprised if a DM said that trying to scrounge up poisonous herbs in a forest was a Hard task. Even if it were only Medium (DC 15), you'd still only have a 20% chance of success. So there's still skill things you cannot attempt, and the numbers aren't far off for things you can attempt with slim chance of success (compare to 4e: for a 10th-level challenge, a Hard task is DC 26, Medium is DC 18; even for -1 from stat, a 10th-level character has +5 from half-level for a total of +4, so while you cannot succeed at the Hard task, you have a 30% chance with the Medium task. These diverge a bit more as you advance, but at the same time, nobody has negative modifiers after level 21, and <em>everything</em> gets the half-level bonus.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EzekielRaiden, post: 6534746, member: 6790260"] I think your example is...more than a little far-fetched. Even if we make all of the characters involved "normal" characters (that is, ones which follow the rules of character creation even if it means not doing everything Gandalf etc. could do), the level-1 Hobbits are going to have net bonuses to their [I]best[/I] stuff (max stat+proficiency) of roughly +6, while Gandalf and Aragorn rock roughly +11. If he's an Evoker (reasonable, he makes fireworks) Gandalf can do more damage with a low-rolling [I]cantrip[/I] than those Hobbits can do on a [I]crit.[/I] And that has nothing on the Hobbits being at risk of immediate death if fighting anything above level 6 or so. In certain narrowly specific ways, yes, this party "works" more than it would have. Most, but not all, foes can be hit by the hobbits with non-crit attacks, but many of them will still be in the 10-15% range. Most, but not all, enemies will not be [I]guaranteed[/I] to hit the hobbits, but their odds of success will be in the 70%-or-higher range. Skill checks that Aragorn finds challenging (say, 40% odds of success) will be nearly impossible for the hobbits (roughly 10-20% [I]with[/I] proficiency and a +3 stat; impossible, or nearly so, if lacking both). So...yeah, I don't think your example is especially great. I can accept, however, that characters within ~5 levels of each other, as long as none of them are below level 3, are close to equivalent in strength; the HD make the biggest difference, and the higher level you are, the smaller that relative difference becomes. The first three levels have such tiny HP values and such enormous risk of death (a typical orc can drop many 1st-level characters with a single crit; two hard hits can outright kill a fragile class) that it is...unwise, IMO, to mix "higher than level 4" characters with characters at level 1 or 2. TL;DR: No, I really [I]don't[/I] think Level 20 Gandalf (or even level 14 Aragorn) can adventure confidently alongside level 1 Samwise and level 2 Frodo. But I do think level 6 Subotai, level 7 Conan, and level 4 Valeria can adventure together more or less alright. Yeah, again, this depends on the difficulty of the check. With a total bonus of -1, if you're trying to do something Hard (DC 20) you cannot possibly succeed. I wouldn't be at all surprised if a DM said that trying to scrounge up poisonous herbs in a forest was a Hard task. Even if it were only Medium (DC 15), you'd still only have a 20% chance of success. So there's still skill things you cannot attempt, and the numbers aren't far off for things you can attempt with slim chance of success (compare to 4e: for a 10th-level challenge, a Hard task is DC 26, Medium is DC 18; even for -1 from stat, a 10th-level character has +5 from half-level for a total of +4, so while you cannot succeed at the Hard task, you have a 30% chance with the Medium task. These diverge a bit more as you advance, but at the same time, nobody has negative modifiers after level 21, and [I]everything[/I] gets the half-level bonus.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What are the Roles now?
Top