Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Imaro" data-source="post: 6542537" data-attributes="member: 48965"><p>I think that on top of the fact that multi-classing was pretty anemic with just the corebooks and thus made it a hard choice to try and be versatile by jumping through inconvenient hoops as opposed to just sticking with what your class did best (your 4e role).  This I think may have also added to the perception that classes were pretty much straight jackets.  I mean IMO it kinda sucked that in order to get a power from another class you had to take a multi-class feat (no power gained), then spend another feat and trade one of your own class powers (2 feats + a power)... to get one power from another class.  After the first one it was still a feat +power to get one power...</p></blockquote><p></p>