Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="TerraDave" data-source="post: 5172017" data-attributes="member: 22260">I have been looking at these classics as part of my little history project. Did you know that between 1978 and 1988, TSR produced about 150 modules for the various editions of D&amp;D? About 50 of these were between 78-83. This includes the 30 or so &quot;classic classics&quot; that make the lists of best modules and tend to come up a lot, plus some &quot;near classics&quot; (Bone Hill, Master of the Desert Nomads...) and some oddities, like solo modules with invisible ink. But then there are the other ~100 that would come out in the next 5 years. Outside of the Dragonlance ones (which shall be discussed in this thread) the horrid Castle Greyhawk (also for this thread) and a few like Black Arrow. Black Shield and Bloodstonepass, there are like 85 I have never heard of, and this is when I was following D&amp;D pretty closely. Just forgettable, too late, or maybe there are a lot of not very good &quot;classics&quot;?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="TerraDave, post: 5172017, member: 22260"] I have been looking at these classics as part of my little history project. Did you know that between 1978 and 1988, TSR produced about [B]150[/B] modules for the various editions of D&D? About 50 of these were between 78-83. This includes the 30 or so "classic classics" that make the lists of best modules and tend to come up a lot, plus some "near classics" (Bone Hill, Master of the Desert Nomads...) and some oddities, like solo modules with invisible ink. But then there are the other ~100 that would come out in the next 5 years. Outside of the Dragonlance ones (which shall be discussed in this thread) the horrid Castle Greyhawk (also for this thread) and a few like Black Arrow. Black Shield and Bloodstonepass, there are like 85 I have never heard of, and this is when I was following D&D pretty closely. Just forgettable, too late, or maybe there are a lot of not very good "classics"? [/QUOTE]

Verification