Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 9610352" data-attributes="member: 18">Oh brother.A wall of text response which:A) Repeatedly accuses me of not having read a book I studied at GCSE so have no only read but done coursework on and passed exams on (seemingly solely on the basis that you didn't like how I stylized his name).B) Says there's only one way to understand the novel on several points, and that I'm understanding it &quot;wrong&quot;. This is pretty funny when we were just discussing the various different possible understandings, and that you're saying actual literary critics just &quot;got it wrong&quot;.I don't think there's any point discussing specifics with someone who is so extreme as to claim everyone who disagrees with him (which is a vast number of people, including a lot of literary critics, SF authors and so on) has a &quot;wildly inaccurate&quot; read on the story. Good lord.I will only say &quot;lol, lmao even&quot; to this, that's a bit much.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 9610352, member: 18"] Oh brother. A wall of text response which: A) Repeatedly accuses me of not having read a book I studied at GCSE so have no only read but done coursework on and passed exams on (seemingly solely on the basis that you didn't like how I stylized his name). B) Says there's only one way to understand the novel on several points, and that I'm understanding it "wrong". This is pretty funny when we were just discussing the various different possible understandings, and that you're saying actual literary critics just "got it wrong". I don't think there's any point discussing specifics with someone who is so extreme as to claim everyone who disagrees with him (which is a vast number of people, including a lot of literary critics, SF authors and so on) has a "wildly inaccurate" read on the story. Good lord. I will only say "lol, lmao even" to this, that's a bit much. [/QUOTE]

Verification