Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
What are you reading in 2025?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Clint_L" data-source="post: 9797695" data-attributes="member: 7035894"><p>Finished <em>Anathem.</em> It's a singular novel that takes huge swings, I found kinda boring to read, and yet interesting to think about.</p><p></p><p>About 3/4 of the way through this seriously epic novel a new character is introduced who is literally named Jules Verne, after the author, which really helped me crystalize my thoughts on <em>Anathem.</em> I mentioned earlier that it felt like a throwback novel, in terms of narrative style. That was obviously what Stephenson was going for, and more specifically inspired by <em>the</em> pioneering sci-fi author.</p><p></p><p>The thing with Jules Verne novels is that they are super talky. They have these really cool, high concept plot hooks, but most of the novel is about 10% plot and 90% exposition. Like, re-read <em>20,000 Leagues Under the Sea</em>: it is pages and pages of Nemo explaining stuff, punctuated by occasional flashes of excitement when a bit of plot happens. That is <em>Anathem</em>, except at ten times the scale.</p><p></p><p>The world-building is almost Tolkien-esque, and an impressive feat in its own right as it constantly weaves in the history of the alternate Earth that is the main setting. The "science" aspect of this sci-fi novel is a sort of mash-up of Platonic Idealism, Cartesian Rationalism and quantum mumbo jumbo; as in most Stephenson novels you don't want to look too closely at the details...except this is a novel that dwells endlessly on them. So for me that often made it tedious, kind of like if <em>Star Wars</em> was 90% people talking about how The Force works rather than just hand-waving the nonsense and getting to the action. So that makes this novel more like the prequels than the original trilogy, if you want to stretch that analogy.</p><p></p><p>So, yeah. Ambitious, unique, occasionally riveting and often stupefyingly dull...it's one of a kind. I'm glad I read it, but I wouldn't recommend it to most readers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Clint_L, post: 9797695, member: 7035894"] Finished [I]Anathem.[/I] It's a singular novel that takes huge swings, I found kinda boring to read, and yet interesting to think about. About 3/4 of the way through this seriously epic novel a new character is introduced who is literally named Jules Verne, after the author, which really helped me crystalize my thoughts on [I]Anathem.[/I] I mentioned earlier that it felt like a throwback novel, in terms of narrative style. That was obviously what Stephenson was going for, and more specifically inspired by [I]the[/I] pioneering sci-fi author. The thing with Jules Verne novels is that they are super talky. They have these really cool, high concept plot hooks, but most of the novel is about 10% plot and 90% exposition. Like, re-read [I]20,000 Leagues Under the Sea[/I]: it is pages and pages of Nemo explaining stuff, punctuated by occasional flashes of excitement when a bit of plot happens. That is [I]Anathem[/I], except at ten times the scale. The world-building is almost Tolkien-esque, and an impressive feat in its own right as it constantly weaves in the history of the alternate Earth that is the main setting. The "science" aspect of this sci-fi novel is a sort of mash-up of Platonic Idealism, Cartesian Rationalism and quantum mumbo jumbo; as in most Stephenson novels you don't want to look too closely at the details...except this is a novel that dwells endlessly on them. So for me that often made it tedious, kind of like if [I]Star Wars[/I] was 90% people talking about how The Force works rather than just hand-waving the nonsense and getting to the action. So that makes this novel more like the prequels than the original trilogy, if you want to stretch that analogy. So, yeah. Ambitious, unique, occasionally riveting and often stupefyingly dull...it's one of a kind. I'm glad I read it, but I wouldn't recommend it to most readers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
What are you reading in 2025?
Top