Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Varianor Abroad" data-source="post: 1245102" data-attributes="member: 12425">1. Spellcaster multiclassing could be better. As written, it's much better than older editions handled it, but loss of higher level spells isn't fun for a player who wants to run with something other than a straightup wizard or cleric concept.2. The "why's" behind the rules could be much better explained. 3.5 tries to fix some of this, but doesn't go far enough. The best example of where a lot more detail would have helped is in the area of treasure awards because too much or too little treasure leads to problems.3. I second several other comments already made, but not as much as the above two, which are my big gripes. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />I do want to say that I really enjoy Third Edition. It brought me back to the game after fourteen years away. Great stuff overall.</blockquote>