Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 7061526" data-attributes="member: 1465">No way... compare it with 3e where you had to wait around evel 12 or 14 to get the same number of spells per day! 6 Spells per day means 1-2 spells per combat. You also get other non-spell magical abilities such as Lay on Hands and Channel Divinity. All in all this is not bad at all considering that spellcasting is supposed to be a secondary feature of Paladins and Rangers.No special challenge. It's not different from playing a multiclass spellcaster/martial character. If anything, it's easier than a full spellcaster in the sense that you overall get a smaller number of spells known to manage and choose from.It's supposed to conflict by design, when they required Divine Smite to use use spell slots. I don't remember right now, but it's even possible that during the playtest years Divine Smite was a spell for a while.I think this is merely due to the traditional image of Paladins being "knights in shiny armor", which matches well with sword & board or 2HW styles, but not with 2WF and archery. This is why the Fighting Styles selection for Paladins is limited.But then... keep in mind that if you want a 2WF Palading you can always do these:- take the 2WF feat- take a level of Fighter- attack with different weapons when using Extra AttackAnd also keep in mind that if a single-class Paladin can't be as good as a 2WF'er as a single-class Fighter or Ranger (exactly because of no access to 2WF Fighting Style), this is also by design. It follows the 5e design principle that some characters simply must have the best options in the game for something that is decided it should be their niche.I don't know, but in general Shillelagh is designed for Druids.</blockquote>Reliable, yes. Certainly not as massive as a Cleric can be.[/QUOTE]

Verification