Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Nifelhein" data-source="post: 1332290" data-attributes="member: 14129">Hey!You almost got me into thinking it would generate the system for me! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />As for comments, I am not gonna make much, as I never have been very much of a fan of this system, but  think making confusion, confusion lesser, heal, mass heal is kind of a bad idea, make it somewhat modular, in my opinion.While I like Mage's spellcasting system, I think it is too much free, I like some options, like spell in level A has this effect more, thus all spells would hae the levels they have more effects.Metamagic suck as they are, don't like them, better have a chain lightining memorized than a Xed, Bed, Ded, Lighning Bolt. Metamagic should be Wizard class abilities and not feat chains, as I hate the pay twice thing too, feat + higher slots.Anyway, i love Midnight's Channeler and I do believe that making something like it might be the way to go for my desires, if I ever go for homebrew again I am surely start out from it and write a damn list for it, them make metamagic a different thing and have a new wizard class, as it should be for my desires.Anyway, diaglo, I love original D&D, have played it only twice, but I must say that every new edition is like a whole new game, the ideas may be quite the same, but even them change...That is why I believe D&D generations stack, no matter the names of the bonuses!  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> Chaaaaaaaaange! And keep the Class list of spells, not exactly, but I like things that are not for one but only for another.</blockquote>

Verification