Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 6272001" data-attributes="member: 2525">I don't get this Imaro.&nbsp; I replied twice with something, both times you ignored it and pretended I didn't say it and strawmanned me on it.&nbsp; Let's try this one last time before &quot;let's drop it but I am going to get a last word in&quot;:1) Let's assume you are correct and you can play Pathfinder with just using NPCs2) Why wouldn't that apply equally to 5e, meaning you only need one PHB to play 5e?Third time I've asked this.&nbsp; It goes to the heart of your argument, and anything which goes to the heart of an argument isn't nit picky.&nbsp; As for Numenera, I brought it up because I did know something about it and I figured it was a fair counter-example, but if you don't like that counter-example that's fine, I dropped it to focus on one thing you did mentioned which I know something about (Pathfinder).As for you saying &quot;others agree with me&quot; I am not sure how you can make an &quot;appeal to majority&quot; argument one minute and then appeal to the majority the next, but I am going to stay consistent and use your standards to apply to both of us.&nbsp; I am positing OK, if you say you can play Pathfinder with just NPCs, let's run with that and apply it to 5e too.&nbsp; What's your reply?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mistwell, post: 6272001, member: 2525"] I don't get this Imaro. I replied twice with something, both times you ignored it and pretended I didn't say it and strawmanned me on it. Let's try this one last time before "let's drop it but I am going to get a last word in": 1) Let's assume you are correct and you can play Pathfinder with just using NPCs 2) Why wouldn't that apply equally to 5e, meaning you only need one PHB to play 5e? Third time I've asked this. It goes to the heart of your argument, and anything which goes to the heart of an argument isn't nit picky. As for Numenera, I brought it up because I did know something about it and I figured it was a fair counter-example, but if you don't like that counter-example that's fine, I dropped it to focus on one thing you did mentioned which I know something about (Pathfinder). As for you saying "others agree with me" I am not sure how you can make an "appeal to majority" argument one minute and then appeal to the majority the next, but I am going to stay consistent and use your standards to apply to both of us. I am positing OK, if you say you can play Pathfinder with just NPCs, let's run with that and apply it to 5e too. What's your reply? [/QUOTE]

Verification