Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Jaeger" data-source="post: 8151548" data-attributes="member: 27996">I know one thing to be true now: Jd Smith has been debating in bad faith from the beginning.And is obviously mentally unequipped to have someone challenge his viewpoint that computer games do Sandbox play better than RPG's.I said: "As for points on which to stand, lets see if you are able to acknowledge one..."He was not.Just one example from our exchange:Oh really!?He made this statement:I replied:I make a point of a GM being far more adaptable than any computer game. Which in my opinion is an a direct refutation of his claim.He then asked for me to: "point out what a CRPG can't do that an RPG can.", and yet I did it in that very post!The intellectual dishonesty to not concede that any point was made, or that any examples were given in reply is plain for all to see just from that one exchange.I caught a hint from his replies what he was doing - which is why I refused to be his dancing monkey and point out the differences between computer and table top RPG's that are obvious to anyone who has experience playing both.This seemed to have caused some vexation.That he choses to take his ball and go home like a spoilt child on the playground with his public announcement of my addition to his ignore list, and claiming some kind of 'victory' at the same time...  Well, people may infer from that what they will..</blockquote>