Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Aristotle" data-source="post: 1782757" data-attributes="member: 5885">Paladin Mounts are about the only thing I dislike (although Paladins as a base class bother me so it don't much matter). I'm indifferent about gnome bards. I like most of the other stuff. I'm really surprised at some of the complaints in this thread...Weapon sizes make a certain amount of sense to me. I loved the idea as soon as I saw it.Square bases... I have no idea what this complaint is all about. As was already explained the critter doesn't take up a square base when not in combat. The square base, and the ajoining threatened areas, are just there to show you how much space the creature can 'control' in a fight. You could obviously fit a horse down a 5' wide corridor or fit two people into a 5' box... but if they had to be fighting while in those situations they wouldn't have the room they need to properly operate.*shrug*</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Aristotle, post: 1782757, member: 5885"] Paladin Mounts are about the only thing I dislike (although Paladins as a base class bother me so it don't much matter). I'm indifferent about gnome bards. I like most of the other stuff. I'm really surprised at some of the complaints in this thread... Weapon sizes make a certain amount of sense to me. I loved the idea as soon as I saw it. Square bases... I have no idea what this complaint is all about. As was already explained the critter doesn't take up a square base when not in combat. The square base, and the ajoining threatened areas, are just there to show you how much space the creature can 'control' in a fight. You could obviously fit a horse down a 5' wide corridor or fit two people into a 5' box... but if they had to be fighting while in those situations they wouldn't have the room they need to properly operate. *shrug* [/QUOTE]

Verification