Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Herremann the Wise" data-source="post: 4538026" data-attributes="member: 11300">I voted wizard as what I think of a wizard and what 4E has titled a &quot;Wizard&quot; are two completely different things. It's not just a case of nerfing (wizard's needed to be brought into line at higher levels in my opinion), it's the overall effect of the mechanics and the feel that these transpose to.As for the Warlord, I'm playing one and it's like playing a puppet master on the field of battle. It certainly embodies the &quot;team&quot; aspect of 4E and so far has been a lot of fun to &quot;play&quot;. I can understand where people are coming from though with the warlord, because when you have all the minis out on the battlemap, and you're directing and co-ordinating the group's attacks, it can feel a little like a boardgame. The best options are pretty obvious and the attack sequence routines that you get the party to do can turn into macros. Still, it is fun to play.Best RegardsHerremann the Wise</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Herremann the Wise, post: 4538026, member: 11300"] I voted wizard as what I think of a wizard and what 4E has titled a "Wizard" are two completely different things. It's not just a case of nerfing (wizard's needed to be brought into line at higher levels in my opinion), it's the overall effect of the mechanics and the feel that these transpose to. As for the Warlord, I'm playing one and it's like playing a puppet master on the field of battle. It certainly embodies the "team" aspect of 4E and so far has been a lot of fun to "play". I can understand where people are coming from though with the warlord, because when you have all the minis out on the battlemap, and you're directing and co-ordinating the group's attacks, it can feel a little like a boardgame. The best options are pretty obvious and the attack sequence routines that you get the party to do can turn into macros. Still, it is fun to play. Best Regards Herremann the Wise [/QUOTE]

Verification