Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Gez" data-source="post: 1181219" data-attributes="member: 1328">There's no &quot;elf&quot; option on this poll.(Yes, I know it's not a class, but Diaglo would tell you it is.)My picks:Barbarians. You don't have to be an inbred savage who hates magic, civilizations, elves, and females. Dude! Fafhrd's cooler than you!Paladin. Murdering people just because you say they register as evil on your radar is neither lawful nor good. Also, lawful good don't means fascist -- that would rather be lawful evil, you know? In lawful good, there's &quot;good&quot;. To me, it's more important than &quot;lawful&quot; for a paladin.Bards. But the D&amp;D class is to blame there. They've got the abilities of a skald with the description of a minstrel.Rangers. There again, it's mostly a problem with the weird class' flavor.Note that those are not from direct experience, but from stories I've heard from various people. In my little group, I would rather have to go with monk.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Gez, post: 1181219, member: 1328"] There's no "elf" option on this poll. (Yes, I know it's not a class, but Diaglo would tell you it is.) My picks: Barbarians. You don't have to be an inbred savage who hates magic, civilizations, elves, and females. Dude! Fafhrd's cooler than you! Paladin. Murdering people just because you say they register as evil on your radar is neither lawful nor good. Also, lawful good don't means fascist -- that would rather be lawful evil, you know? In lawful good, there's "good". To me, it's more important than "lawful" for a paladin. Bards. But the D&D class is to blame there. They've got the abilities of a skald with the description of a minstrel. Rangers. There again, it's mostly a problem with the weird class' flavor. Note that those are not from direct experience, but from stories I've heard from various people. In my little group, I would rather have to go with monk. [/QUOTE]

Verification