Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What classes will be in the martial power book?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Raduin711" data-source="post: 4039884" data-attributes="member: 15303"><p>Cavalier- D&D has long had a love affair with this concept, but it never seems to work. Perhaps the Knight in the PHB2. However, this is a second martial defender, and would really just be redundant next to the Fighter class at the moment. Again, we are trying to show love for the fighter, not outdo him in the first supplement. Aside from being a paladin without the magic, I really can't see anything that this class could do that the fighter couldn't, except perhaps as a class based on horseback fighting.</p><p></p><p>Archer- Lots of players seek the Archer archetype, so it stands to reason that this could be a class of its own, except that it is probably stepping on the toes of the Ranger, who tries to occupy both the Bow-User and Two-Weapon-Fighter archetypes... Again, we are trying to show love to the new classes, rather than overshadow them.</p><p></p><p>Alchemist- I love the idea of an alchemist class. I think ever since I saw the alchemist in Exodus Ultima I wanted to see an alchemist class in D&D. (not to say the alchemist in Exodus was a terribly good class... It was basically half the strength of the wizard. But it seemed like a cool idea...) I often try to play to that archetype myself. BUT, I don't think it qualifies as a martial class. To me, an alchemist is someone who is both a primitive scientist and a magician. He excels at brewing potions and tossing explosives, and even perhaps an inventor. Even if you take away the magical portion of it, and leave it as a primitive scientist, the alchemist still isn't what I would call a martial class. Nonmagical, yes, but martial, no. </p><p></p><p>I don't know... going over it, I really expect these first books to be more like the sword & fist/tome & blood/etc. run of books than the later "complete" series... books to build on the classes in the PHB, rather than an introduction for new classes.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Raduin711, post: 4039884, member: 15303"] Cavalier- D&D has long had a love affair with this concept, but it never seems to work. Perhaps the Knight in the PHB2. However, this is a second martial defender, and would really just be redundant next to the Fighter class at the moment. Again, we are trying to show love for the fighter, not outdo him in the first supplement. Aside from being a paladin without the magic, I really can't see anything that this class could do that the fighter couldn't, except perhaps as a class based on horseback fighting. Archer- Lots of players seek the Archer archetype, so it stands to reason that this could be a class of its own, except that it is probably stepping on the toes of the Ranger, who tries to occupy both the Bow-User and Two-Weapon-Fighter archetypes... Again, we are trying to show love to the new classes, rather than overshadow them. Alchemist- I love the idea of an alchemist class. I think ever since I saw the alchemist in Exodus Ultima I wanted to see an alchemist class in D&D. (not to say the alchemist in Exodus was a terribly good class... It was basically half the strength of the wizard. But it seemed like a cool idea...) I often try to play to that archetype myself. BUT, I don't think it qualifies as a martial class. To me, an alchemist is someone who is both a primitive scientist and a magician. He excels at brewing potions and tossing explosives, and even perhaps an inventor. Even if you take away the magical portion of it, and leave it as a primitive scientist, the alchemist still isn't what I would call a martial class. Nonmagical, yes, but martial, no. I don't know... going over it, I really expect these first books to be more like the sword & fist/tome & blood/etc. run of books than the later "complete" series... books to build on the classes in the PHB, rather than an introduction for new classes. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What classes will be in the martial power book?
Top