Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What classic setting SHOULD WotC publish and why?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Eyes of Nine" data-source="post: 8275673" data-attributes="member: 99786"><p><s>Some setting that some super popular streamer has, tbh. Or some random mtg setting</s></p><p></p><p>Ah, you said "classic" setting. Well, that's a bit different. I'm not even sure Nentir Vale qualifies, but I'll let that slide for now.</p><p></p><p>So "should publish" is a fraught phrase (say "fraught phrase" 10 times fast). Ie, from a business standpoint? From a fan-service standpoint? From a "creative" standpoint? Maybe I'll try to answer all 3, in reverse order.</p><p></p><p>From a creative standpoint, I think a Planescape/Spelljammer mashup provides the biggest canvas area for expansion. It can expand beyond just Sigil and also allow both a "default" multiverse setting as well as provide rules to DMs who want to create their own. The full breakdown of the inner and outer and demi planes can be explored in depth. There's all kinds of places, beings, factions etc to delve into.</p><p></p><p>From a fan-service standpoint, if I was to only go off of ENWorld, it feels like there are top level desired settings like Dark Sun, Greyhawk, Planescape, Dragonlance, and Spelljammer; and then other less popular settings like Ghostwalk or Birthright. So for maximum fan-service, go for one of those 5. Someone up thread said that having settings like FR should probably take them out of the running, and I agree that probably crosses off Greyhawk and DL. If you mashup Planescape and Spelljammer, you cover 2 fan-desired properties at once!</p><p></p><p>Finally, from a business standpoint. As you can see I'm angling for a PS/SJ mashup. BUT, I believe PS intellectual property is partially owned by Tony Diterlizzi? Maybe not, that might be fake news - happy to be steered right on that. But if he partially owns the IP, that could be a hurdle for any sort of PS setting or adventure book.</p><p></p><p>However Planescape and Spelljammer also fit into the overall MTG Planeswalker concepts; and could potentially provide an in-canon link to the MTG planes. Which could result in the greatest thing no one expected back in 1995, a Blood Wars/Magic the Gathering release. Wow.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Eyes of Nine, post: 8275673, member: 99786"] [S]Some setting that some super popular streamer has, tbh. Or some random mtg setting[/S] Ah, you said "classic" setting. Well, that's a bit different. I'm not even sure Nentir Vale qualifies, but I'll let that slide for now. So "should publish" is a fraught phrase (say "fraught phrase" 10 times fast). Ie, from a business standpoint? From a fan-service standpoint? From a "creative" standpoint? Maybe I'll try to answer all 3, in reverse order. From a creative standpoint, I think a Planescape/Spelljammer mashup provides the biggest canvas area for expansion. It can expand beyond just Sigil and also allow both a "default" multiverse setting as well as provide rules to DMs who want to create their own. The full breakdown of the inner and outer and demi planes can be explored in depth. There's all kinds of places, beings, factions etc to delve into. From a fan-service standpoint, if I was to only go off of ENWorld, it feels like there are top level desired settings like Dark Sun, Greyhawk, Planescape, Dragonlance, and Spelljammer; and then other less popular settings like Ghostwalk or Birthright. So for maximum fan-service, go for one of those 5. Someone up thread said that having settings like FR should probably take them out of the running, and I agree that probably crosses off Greyhawk and DL. If you mashup Planescape and Spelljammer, you cover 2 fan-desired properties at once! Finally, from a business standpoint. As you can see I'm angling for a PS/SJ mashup. BUT, I believe PS intellectual property is partially owned by Tony Diterlizzi? Maybe not, that might be fake news - happy to be steered right on that. But if he partially owns the IP, that could be a hurdle for any sort of PS setting or adventure book. However Planescape and Spelljammer also fit into the overall MTG Planeswalker concepts; and could potentially provide an in-canon link to the MTG planes. Which could result in the greatest thing no one expected back in 1995, a Blood Wars/Magic the Gathering release. Wow. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What classic setting SHOULD WotC publish and why?
Top