Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What defines the "edition war" and why are participants / moderators opposed to them?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mercurius" data-source="post: 5078440" data-attributes="member: 59082"><p>I agree with the original poster, although as an academic he should be well familiar with the semantic minefield of the postmodern era ;-). A lot of it has to do with phrasing; as one poster said, people get upset when they feel that you are confusing your own subjective opinion with objective truth. This leads to the ridiculous need to disclaim everything with "IMHO" and other stool softeners, and leads to a kind doublespeak, bogging down meaningful conversation (IMHO, of course!).</p><p></p><p>The other aspect of this that is hugely problematic (imo) is the common knee-jerk assumption of trolling. I mean, I'm honestly surprised that no one has accused you of trolling (yet), even though you obviously are not. If someone expresses a negative or critical opinion on something, or even just brings up a controversial topic, they are immediately assumed to be trolling and attacked for it. Actually, EN World is relatively tame in this regard. RPGNet, a site I otherwise like, is much worse; I have witnessed numerous cases where someone voices an unpopular opinion and gets piled on with ad hominems and moderation stands by and does nothing, except maybe to chastise the OP for voicing said unpopular opinion.</p><p></p><p>On the other hand, I can also understand and appreciate why moderators put out sparks before they fan into fires. My own personal approach would be much more liberal, however, because I think we lose a lot of interesting conversation in the name of keeping the peace (and status quo), but I can also see how feelings get hurt and the community fabric begins to unravel if things get too out of hand. But then it becomes a matter of treading softly and knowing how to play the semantic game. In general, I have found EN World moderators to be a reasonable bunch and pretty adept at discerning nuances; I have seen many instances where someone posted something similar to the OP and got attacked, and a moderator (rightly) stepped in and warned the attacker, not the OP.</p><p></p><p>But yeah, let's talk about the merits and demerits of different editions. We just have to do it skillfully.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mercurius, post: 5078440, member: 59082"] I agree with the original poster, although as an academic he should be well familiar with the semantic minefield of the postmodern era ;-). A lot of it has to do with phrasing; as one poster said, people get upset when they feel that you are confusing your own subjective opinion with objective truth. This leads to the ridiculous need to disclaim everything with "IMHO" and other stool softeners, and leads to a kind doublespeak, bogging down meaningful conversation (IMHO, of course!). The other aspect of this that is hugely problematic (imo) is the common knee-jerk assumption of trolling. I mean, I'm honestly surprised that no one has accused you of trolling (yet), even though you obviously are not. If someone expresses a negative or critical opinion on something, or even just brings up a controversial topic, they are immediately assumed to be trolling and attacked for it. Actually, EN World is relatively tame in this regard. RPGNet, a site I otherwise like, is much worse; I have witnessed numerous cases where someone voices an unpopular opinion and gets piled on with ad hominems and moderation stands by and does nothing, except maybe to chastise the OP for voicing said unpopular opinion. On the other hand, I can also understand and appreciate why moderators put out sparks before they fan into fires. My own personal approach would be much more liberal, however, because I think we lose a lot of interesting conversation in the name of keeping the peace (and status quo), but I can also see how feelings get hurt and the community fabric begins to unravel if things get too out of hand. But then it becomes a matter of treading softly and knowing how to play the semantic game. In general, I have found EN World moderators to be a reasonable bunch and pretty adept at discerning nuances; I have seen many instances where someone posted something similar to the OP and got attacked, and a moderator (rightly) stepped in and warned the attacker, not the OP. But yeah, let's talk about the merits and demerits of different editions. We just have to do it skillfully. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What defines the "edition war" and why are participants / moderators opposed to them?
Top