Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Odhanan" data-source="post: 2839011" data-attributes="member: 12324">Resign ourselves, just like we resign ourselves with some archetypes in the game right now. No rules set can represent faithfully all that imagination can come up with, because not everything will be fun for instance, because it wouldn't be "balanced" or wouldn't be useful in the game, and because there should be limits according to the inner consistency of the campaign, whatever and wherever you put the limits.The difference today is that an archetype can be represented in a d20 game in a variety of ways which have a greater chance to satisfy a greater variety of individual players with different tastes and different reasons to play the same type of fantasy archetype. Some would like to play a "monk" for instance to play Cadfael, or some sort of undead hunter, or an Inquisitor like Bernado Guy, or a buddhist monk, and all these different takes on the topic are more likely to be feasible within the frame of d20, in my opinion. So that's all good.</blockquote>