Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="hellbender" data-source="post: 450303" data-attributes="member: 795">Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: World of Warhammer Encyclopedia     Artwise, and to be fair: the mohawk dwarves are very uncommon, they are outlandish for a reason; for some trangression and/or shame, they are seeking a redeeming death, and if you were adventuring with a regular dwarf and a slayer, that lets you know which one is safe to stand next to at any given time.     For another outlook on new Warhammer art, open just about any Wotc 3e DnD book and you will see Wayne Reynolds. Also, check out Warhammer Monthly in addition to the army books. After GW got Adrian Smith back, and with the Kopinskis and Paul Dainton among others, there is really no more cartoony Warhammer art.      Settingwise: As mentioned earlier (by others and myself), the BoVD is not what one is looking for to get the point of evil across. For that, you need actual books on evil and chaos, the original Realms of Chaos books. I have mine after all these years, and they are still awesome inspiration. I was one of the detractors to the BoVD, then I saw it, and realized that I was wrong, as was the 'blood is too kewlio' crowd. The RoC are evil in book form.Blood for the Blood God!hellbender</blockquote>