Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mustrum_Ridcully" data-source="post: 4553421" data-attributes="member: 710">I would think so. And I don't believe Highwayman is now suddenly alone.But I think scrapping the idea of monster types as monster classes might be acceptable to &quot;PC/NPC transparency&quot; fans. After all, PC races are not classes, either. You &quot;just&quot; need to come up with a convincing and working class design that is in fact easier to use then the current one. But to be true to 3E and the PC/NPC transparency goals it should work pretty close to 3E.Maybe this approach still won't work. Maybe you'd had to make 3E characters easier, too. We might never see, though I wish people like Jason, Wulf or Raven Crowkring a lot of luck in their attempts and might actually look into the final results, and occasionally (very occasionally) peek into their ongoing work. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mustrum_Ridcully, post: 4553421, member: 710"] I would think so. And I don't believe [I]Highwayman[/I] is now suddenly alone. But I think scrapping the idea of monster types as monster classes might be acceptable to "PC/NPC transparency" fans. After all, PC races are not classes, either. You "just" need to come up with a convincing and working class design that is in fact easier to use then the current one. But to be true to 3E and the PC/NPC transparency goals it should work pretty close to 3E. Maybe this approach still won't work. Maybe you'd had to make 3E characters easier, too. We might never see, though I wish people like Jason, Wulf or Raven Crowkring a lot of luck in their attempts and might actually look into the final results, and occasionally (very occasionally) peek into their ongoing work. ;) [/QUOTE]

Verification