Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Obryn" data-source="post: 4557188" data-attributes="member: 11821">I know I was happy to wing it in 3e, and I got pretty darn good at it.&nbsp; 4e made it easier with a few quick rules of thumb &amp; Page 42.&nbsp; But yeah, it certainly wasn't impossible for any DM to wing it.But seriously - put a monster or character in a published module which doesn't follow the 3.5 rules.&nbsp; Publish it.&nbsp; How long a complaint thread do you think you'd get on ENWorld or WotC's boards about your poor mastery of statistics and simple game mechanics? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> Would it be considered an error, to be errata'd?&nbsp; Would it be mentioned in reviews?If you explained you're basically winging it, do you think that would fly?&nbsp; Or would it be considered lazy and/or poor design?-O</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Obryn, post: 4557188, member: 11821"] I know I was happy to wing it in 3e, and I got pretty darn good at it. 4e made it easier with a few quick rules of thumb & Page 42. But yeah, it certainly wasn't impossible for any DM to wing it. But seriously - put a monster or character in a published module which doesn't follow the 3.5 rules. Publish it. How long a complaint thread do you think you'd get on ENWorld or WotC's boards about your poor mastery of statistics and simple game mechanics? :) Would it be considered an error, to be errata'd? Would it be mentioned in reviews? If you explained you're basically winging it, do you think that would fly? Or would it be considered lazy and/or poor design? -O [/QUOTE]

Verification