Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Garthanos" data-source="post: 4920098" data-attributes="member: 82504">I very well could have missed something as I pretty splash around my reading of game books (they feel like too much work if I do the linear route)Text I found in the DMG is so small it could be very nearly be quoted verbatem in under &quot;fair use&quot; provisions... an itty bitty comment about combat encounters being more difficult even if scaled down. And the paragraphs covering about half a page about missing rolesHmmmmmm this does not even qualify as a nod.(its more of a Warning).And even when it mentions Allies as extra characters there isn't even a&nbsp; mention low player count as a potential reason ;-) maybe that is too obvious of reason -- no need to hit people over the head with obvious I guess, but still its pretty easy to read that as &quot;your game style not supported&quot;.Do any of them modules have notes about how you might adjust them for lower party size? That would be evidence.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Garthanos, post: 4920098, member: 82504"] I very well could have missed something as I pretty splash around my reading of game books (they feel like too much work if I do the linear route) Text I found in the DMG is so small it could be very nearly be quoted verbatem in under "fair use" provisions... an itty bitty comment about combat encounters being more difficult even if scaled down. And the paragraphs covering about half a page about missing roles Hmmmmmm this does not even qualify as a nod.(its more of a Warning). And even when it mentions Allies as extra characters there isn't even a mention low player count as a potential reason ;-) maybe that is too obvious of reason -- no need to hit people over the head with obvious I guess, but still its pretty easy to read that as "your game style not supported". Do any of them modules have notes about how you might adjust them for lower party size? That would be evidence. [/QUOTE]

Verification