Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What do I want? An apology.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deimodius" data-source="post: 3484122" data-attributes="member: 14322"><p>Enforcer, as seen in the quote above, I believe your argument is flawed. The only people who are really affected by the cancellation of the magazines are those who purchased it. Those who _didn't_ are irrelevant to the discussion since the existence, or cancellation of the magazines has no affect on them. Thus a poll asking (or including) NON-readers whether or not the magazines should be allowed to die in print format does not demonstrate the will of the people who will actually be affected by the outcome of the poll.</p><p></p><p>If the magazines had been allowed to continue concurrently with the DI, people who were already NOT readers of the mag would likely subscribe to the DI in the same proportion (of non-mag readers) who will be subscribing now. Thus the ONLY people WotC wants to force to move from mag to DI are the consumers of the magazine!</p><p></p><p>Their decision affects 0% of players who were NOT consumers of the magazines.</p><p>Their decision affects 100% of the players who ARE consumers of the magazines.</p><p>(Note: I am not suggestion that 100% of mag consumers are angry, just that it is a fact they are affected by the decision).</p><p></p><p>WotC _should_ have asked two questions, one to the consumers of the mags, and one to the non-consumers.</p><p></p><p>Consumers: Would you prefer to have the content of Dragon and Dungeon availlable online _instead_ of print.</p><p></p><p>Non-consumers: Would you like online content?</p><p></p><p>If the majority of mag non-consumers subscribe to the DI, nothing has changed.</p><p>if the majority of mag consumers _do not_ subscribe, nothing has changed.</p><p></p><p>The only way this decision actually makes sense is if the majority of magazine consumers would prefer to (and ultimately do) subscribe to the DI. That remains to be seen, but perhaps instead of suggesting that the number of people upset are the minority, you should ask if they are, in fact, the _majority_ of those who consumed the magazine.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deimodius, post: 3484122, member: 14322"] Enforcer, as seen in the quote above, I believe your argument is flawed. The only people who are really affected by the cancellation of the magazines are those who purchased it. Those who _didn't_ are irrelevant to the discussion since the existence, or cancellation of the magazines has no affect on them. Thus a poll asking (or including) NON-readers whether or not the magazines should be allowed to die in print format does not demonstrate the will of the people who will actually be affected by the outcome of the poll. If the magazines had been allowed to continue concurrently with the DI, people who were already NOT readers of the mag would likely subscribe to the DI in the same proportion (of non-mag readers) who will be subscribing now. Thus the ONLY people WotC wants to force to move from mag to DI are the consumers of the magazine! Their decision affects 0% of players who were NOT consumers of the magazines. Their decision affects 100% of the players who ARE consumers of the magazines. (Note: I am not suggestion that 100% of mag consumers are angry, just that it is a fact they are affected by the decision). WotC _should_ have asked two questions, one to the consumers of the mags, and one to the non-consumers. Consumers: Would you prefer to have the content of Dragon and Dungeon availlable online _instead_ of print. Non-consumers: Would you like online content? If the majority of mag non-consumers subscribe to the DI, nothing has changed. if the majority of mag consumers _do not_ subscribe, nothing has changed. The only way this decision actually makes sense is if the majority of magazine consumers would prefer to (and ultimately do) subscribe to the DI. That remains to be seen, but perhaps instead of suggesting that the number of people upset are the minority, you should ask if they are, in fact, the _majority_ of those who consumed the magazine. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What do I want? An apology.
Top