Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
What do you ban? (3.5)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 5424786" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>It can be made less broken if you actually force the spellcaster to bargain with the spirit he summons. It doesn't hurt to tweak the spell so that it depends not on HD but CR so that the caster can't abuse low HD high magic creatures. </p><p></p><p>Most of the problems I see with the spell usage described by other DMs come from what I see as the DM being overgenerous with the idea that the creature doesn't mind being summoned and is eager or willing to help. Compelling the creature to give you wishes would pretty much count as 'unreasonable service', and even if the creature was willing you'd almost certainly be dealing with 'monkey's paw wishes' from the compelled creature.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So, you ask a devious fiend to commune with some outer planar being on your behalf (presumably a greater devil of some sort), and that outer planar being is itself likely manipulate the truth and the fiend who is so compelled is likely to lie or withhold critical information from the answer, and you think that this trivializes the situation?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Unreasonable service. The Glabrezu would likely outright refuse and be within the wording of the spell to do so. And if he doesn't, heaven help you (literally) from the results of a wish compelled unwillingly from a fiend. Talk about something likely to twist the wording of the spell - the DM woudln't even be being much of a RBDM to do so in that case.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So you think Archons are completely happy to help a diabolist consort with fiends? Especially those that do things like the following...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>First of all, how in the world do you think society treats a diabolist that summons up fiends to seduce soveriegn monarchs? Second of all, how long do you think a society would last if they didn't take protections from this vary obvious thing? Do you think your character is the very first wizard/cleric to ever think, "Gee, I can get phenomenal power by summoning up a fiend! I could even mind-control the King, forcing everyone to obey my commands!" I mean that's 'Evil Plot 101', and like Paul Maud'Dib learned dozens of words for poisons and how to avoid them and never ate without a poison sniffer hovering over his food, in a world with Planar Binding you can believe that the sovereigns wouldn't go anywhere without at least some sort of 'Protection from X' about their person.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Again, unreasonable command or service, and any DM that let's a player compell wishes from an unwilling creature bound only by a non-permenent spell without twisting every letter of the wish is getting what they deserve. At the very least, we are talking about winning a difficult resisted charisma check.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm not sure that I agree that an illusionary Efreeti with half normal HD retains 'grant wishes' as a power appropriate to its new HD. I'm not even sure any spell-casting ability is appropriate, but at the very least its new caster level ought to be half (6th in this case) and any spells not normally castable by a 6th level caster ought to be reevaluated. Very generously, I <em>might</em> consider limited wish a possibility here, but even more likely I might tell you that the thing is an illusion and granting wishes is now bloody well beyond its new power.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's more like it. Those are the sort of bargains I can imagine the beings entering into, though you'd probably be better off with some sort of bribe in each case.</p><p></p><p>Seriously, the spell description requires the DM to use judgment. The DM must assign difficulties, must RP out the being according to its wishes and desires, and must decide what is 'unreasonable'. If the DM doesn't excercise judgment like that, then you can't blame the spell (entirely) for it being broken in application.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 5424786, member: 4937"] It can be made less broken if you actually force the spellcaster to bargain with the spirit he summons. It doesn't hurt to tweak the spell so that it depends not on HD but CR so that the caster can't abuse low HD high magic creatures. Most of the problems I see with the spell usage described by other DMs come from what I see as the DM being overgenerous with the idea that the creature doesn't mind being summoned and is eager or willing to help. Compelling the creature to give you wishes would pretty much count as 'unreasonable service', and even if the creature was willing you'd almost certainly be dealing with 'monkey's paw wishes' from the compelled creature. So, you ask a devious fiend to commune with some outer planar being on your behalf (presumably a greater devil of some sort), and that outer planar being is itself likely manipulate the truth and the fiend who is so compelled is likely to lie or withhold critical information from the answer, and you think that this trivializes the situation? Unreasonable service. The Glabrezu would likely outright refuse and be within the wording of the spell to do so. And if he doesn't, heaven help you (literally) from the results of a wish compelled unwillingly from a fiend. Talk about something likely to twist the wording of the spell - the DM woudln't even be being much of a RBDM to do so in that case. So you think Archons are completely happy to help a diabolist consort with fiends? Especially those that do things like the following... First of all, how in the world do you think society treats a diabolist that summons up fiends to seduce soveriegn monarchs? Second of all, how long do you think a society would last if they didn't take protections from this vary obvious thing? Do you think your character is the very first wizard/cleric to ever think, "Gee, I can get phenomenal power by summoning up a fiend! I could even mind-control the King, forcing everyone to obey my commands!" I mean that's 'Evil Plot 101', and like Paul Maud'Dib learned dozens of words for poisons and how to avoid them and never ate without a poison sniffer hovering over his food, in a world with Planar Binding you can believe that the sovereigns wouldn't go anywhere without at least some sort of 'Protection from X' about their person. Again, unreasonable command or service, and any DM that let's a player compell wishes from an unwilling creature bound only by a non-permenent spell without twisting every letter of the wish is getting what they deserve. At the very least, we are talking about winning a difficult resisted charisma check. I'm not sure that I agree that an illusionary Efreeti with half normal HD retains 'grant wishes' as a power appropriate to its new HD. I'm not even sure any spell-casting ability is appropriate, but at the very least its new caster level ought to be half (6th in this case) and any spells not normally castable by a 6th level caster ought to be reevaluated. Very generously, I [I]might[/I] consider limited wish a possibility here, but even more likely I might tell you that the thing is an illusion and granting wishes is now bloody well beyond its new power. That's more like it. Those are the sort of bargains I can imagine the beings entering into, though you'd probably be better off with some sort of bribe in each case. Seriously, the spell description requires the DM to use judgment. The DM must assign difficulties, must RP out the being according to its wishes and desires, and must decide what is 'unreasonable'. If the DM doesn't excercise judgment like that, then you can't blame the spell (entirely) for it being broken in application. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
What do you ban? (3.5)
Top