Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
What do you ban? (3.5)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="StreamOfTheSky" data-source="post: 5444761" data-attributes="member: 35909"><p>This brings up something I wouldn't mind inquiring about to see if anyone else feels the same way: I kind of wish level adjustment came in two "tiers": LA from race, and LA from templates, instead of having the same effects on your character's growth. Specifically, make the former less punitive than the latter. Because as you named some off, there are a fair number of inexpensive templates to pick from that add great power and can be applied to most race choices. I find that really tacky and cheap and that it detracts from picking non-human-like races. Why be a big strong race with a fixed "package" of benefits and limitations based on flavor, when you can just pick the template you like off a menu and say "can I have human bonus feat with that?" I ran a gestalt game last time and used the E6 idea of LA being treated as lower point buy (I adjusted the values a little, though). If I used that system again, I would definitely like to try making racial LA use a different table or something, that makes the costs less. What do others think? Just the general idea that template LA should be looked at differently from racial LA?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="StreamOfTheSky, post: 5444761, member: 35909"] This brings up something I wouldn't mind inquiring about to see if anyone else feels the same way: I kind of wish level adjustment came in two "tiers": LA from race, and LA from templates, instead of having the same effects on your character's growth. Specifically, make the former less punitive than the latter. Because as you named some off, there are a fair number of inexpensive templates to pick from that add great power and can be applied to most race choices. I find that really tacky and cheap and that it detracts from picking non-human-like races. Why be a big strong race with a fixed "package" of benefits and limitations based on flavor, when you can just pick the template you like off a menu and say "can I have human bonus feat with that?" I ran a gestalt game last time and used the E6 idea of LA being treated as lower point buy (I adjusted the values a little, though). If I used that system again, I would definitely like to try making racial LA use a different table or something, that makes the costs less. What do others think? Just the general idea that template LA should be looked at differently from racial LA? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
What do you ban? (3.5)
Top